Cohen Sheldon, Gianaros Peter J, Manuck Stephen B
Carnegie Melon University
University of Pittsburgh.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):456-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691616646305.
In this article, we argued that the term stress has served as a valuable heuristic, helping researchers to integrate traditions that illuminate different stages of the process linking stressful life events to disease. We provided a short history of three traditions in the study of stress: the epidemiological, psychological, and biological. The epidemiological tradition focuses on defining which circumstances and experiences are deemed stressful on the basis of consensual agreement that they constitute threats to social or physical well-being. The psychological tradition focuses on individuals' perceptions of the stress presented by life events on the basis of their appraisals of the threats posed and the availability of effective coping resources. The biological tradition focuses on brain-based perturbations of physiological systems that are otherwise essential for normal homeostatic regulation and metabolic control. The foci of these three traditions have informed elements of a stage model of disease, wherein events appraised as stressful are viewed as triggering affective states that in turn engender behavioral and biological responses having possible downstream implications for disease.
在本文中,我们认为“压力”一词是一种很有价值的启发式概念,帮助研究人员整合不同的传统研究,这些传统研究阐明了将应激性生活事件与疾病联系起来的过程中的不同阶段。我们简要介绍了压力研究中的三种传统:流行病学传统、心理学传统和生物学传统。流行病学传统侧重于根据人们普遍认为某些情况和经历对社会或身体健康构成威胁的共识,来界定哪些情况和经历被视为有压力的。心理学传统侧重于个体基于对所构成威胁的评估以及有效应对资源的可用性,对生活事件所带来的压力的认知。生物学传统侧重于基于大脑对生理系统的扰动,而这些生理系统对于正常的稳态调节和代谢控制至关重要。这三种传统的重点为疾病阶段模型的要素提供了信息,在该模型中,被评估为有压力的事件被视为引发情感状态,进而产生可能对疾病有下游影响的行为和生物学反应。