Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Sep;27(3):307-318. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9657-y.
Objective To evaluate the implementation process of a workers' health surveillance (WHS) program in a Dutch meat processing company. Methods Workers from five plants were eligible to participate in the WHS program. The program consisted of four evaluative components and an intervention component. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to evaluate seven process aspects. Data were gathered by interviews with stakeholders, participant questionnaires, and from registries of the company and occupational health service. Results Two recruitment strategies were used: open invitation or automatic participation. Of the 986 eligible workers, 305 participated in the program. Average reach was 53 %. Two out of five program components could not be assessed on dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. If components were assessable, 85-100 % of the components was delivered, 66-100 % of the components was received by participants, and fidelity was 100 %. Participants were satisfied with the WHS program (mean score 7.6). Contextual factors that facilitated implementation were among others societal developments and management support. Factors that formed barriers were program novelty and delayed follow-up. Conclusion The WHS program was well received by participants. Not all participants were offered the same number of program components, and not all components were performed according to protocol. Deviation from protocol is an indication of program failure and may affect program effectiveness.
评估荷兰一家肉类加工公司工人健康监测(WHS)计划的实施过程。
五家工厂的工人有资格参加 WHS 计划。该计划由四个评估部分和一个干预部分组成。采用定性和定量方法评估了七个过程方面。通过对利益相关者的访谈、参与者问卷以及公司和职业健康服务的登记册收集数据。
使用了两种招聘策略:公开邀请或自动参与。在 986 名符合条件的工人中,有 305 名参加了该计划。平均覆盖率为 53%。五个计划组成部分中的两个无法评估剂量传递、剂量接收和保真度。如果可以评估组件,则交付了 85-100%的组件,参与者接收了 66-100%的组件,保真度为 100%。参与者对 WHS 计划表示满意(平均得分为 7.6)。促进实施的背景因素包括社会发展和管理支持等。形成障碍的因素是计划的新颖性和延迟的后续行动。
WHS 计划受到参与者的欢迎。并非所有参与者都提供相同数量的计划组件,并且并非所有组件都按照方案进行。偏离方案表明计划失败,可能会影响计划效果。