Jerabek Andrea S, Wall Kara R, Stallings Christopher D
College of Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, United States.
PeerJ. 2016 Jul 14;4:e2213. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2213. eCollection 2016.
Biofouling of experimental cages and other field apparatuses can be problematic for scientists and has traditionally been addressed using frequent manual removal (e.g., scraping, scrubbing). Recent environmental restrictions and legislative changes have driven the development of less hazardous antifouling products, making antifouling paint a potential alternative option to manual removal. Consequently, the viability of using these newly developed products as a replacement for the manual cleaning of exclusion cages was experimentally investigated. There were six treatments tested, comprising three with settlement tiles in experimental cages coated with antifouling paint, two with settlement tiles in unpainted experimental cages, and one cage-free suspended tile. The three antifouling treatments comprised two reduced-copper paints (21% Cu2O and 40% Cu2O) and one copper-free, Econea (™)-based paint (labeled "ecofriendly"). Antifouling paints were assessed for performance of preventing fouling of the cages and whether they elicited local effects on settlement tiles contained within them. All three paints performed well to reduce fouling of the cages during the initial six weeks of the experiment, but the efficacy of "ecofriendly" paint began to decrease during an extended deployment that lasted 14 weeks. The macro-community composition, biomass, and percent cover of settled organism on tiles within cages treated with copper-based paints (21% and 40% concentrations) were indistinguishable from tiles within the manually scrubbed cages. In contrast, settlement to tiles from the "ecofriendly" treatment was different in composition of macro-community and lower in biomass, suggesting the presence of local effects and therefore rendering it unsuitable for use in settlement experiments. The results of this study suggest that reduced-copper paints have the potential to serve as an alternative to manual maintenance, which may be useful for deployments in locations that are difficult to access on a frequent schedule.
实验网箱和其他野外设备的生物污损对科学家来说可能是个问题,传统上通过频繁的人工清除(如刮擦、擦洗)来解决。最近的环境限制和立法变化推动了危害较小的防污产品的开发,使防污漆成为人工清除的潜在替代选择。因此,对使用这些新开发的产品替代人工清洁隔离网箱的可行性进行了实验研究。测试了六种处理方法,包括三种在涂有防污漆的实验网箱中放置附着基瓦片的处理,两种在未涂漆的实验网箱中放置附着基瓦片的处理,以及一种无网箱悬挂瓦片的处理。三种防污处理包括两种低铜漆(21% Cu2O和40% Cu2O)和一种无铜、基于Econea(™)的漆(标记为“环保型”)。评估了防污漆防止网箱污损的性能以及它们是否对其中包含的附着基瓦片产生局部影响。在实验的最初六周内,所有三种漆在减少网箱污损方面表现良好,但在持续14周的延长部署期间,“环保型”漆的功效开始下降。用铜基漆(21%和40%浓度)处理的网箱内瓦片中定居生物的大型群落组成、生物量和覆盖百分比与人工擦洗网箱内的瓦片没有区别。相比之下,“环保型”处理的瓦片上的定居生物在大型群落组成上不同,生物量较低,表明存在局部影响,因此使其不适用于定居实验。这项研究的结果表明,低铜漆有可能替代人工维护,这对于在难以频繁进入的地点进行部署可能是有用的。