Textile Engineering Laboratory, University of Monastir, Tunisia.
Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of Pollutants of the Environment and Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Monastir, Tunisia.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;57:115-130. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
The production infrastructure in aquaculture invariably is a complex assortment of submerged components with cages, nets, floats and ropes. Cages are generally made from polyamide or high density polyethylene (PEHD). All of these structures serve as surfaces for biofouling. However, cage nets and supporting infrastructure offer fouling organisms thousands of square meters of multifilament netting. That's why, before immersing them in seawater, they should be coated with an antifouling agent. It helps to prevent net occlusion and to increase its lifespan. Biofouling in marine aquaculture is a specific problem and has three main negative effects. It causes net occlusion and so restricts water and oxygen exchange. Besides, the low dissolved oxygen levels from poor water exchange increases the stress levels of fish, lowers immunity and increases vulnerability to disease. Also, the extra weight imposed by fouling causes cage deformation and structural fatigue. The maintenance and loss of equipment cause the increase of production costs for the industry. Biocides are chemical substances that can prohibit or kill microorganisms responsible for biofouling. The expansion of the aquaculture industry requires the use of more drugs, disinfectants and antifoulant compounds (biocides) to eliminate the microorganisms in the aquaculture facilities. Unfortunately, the use of biocides in the aquatic environment has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment. The most commonly used biocides in antifouling paints are Tributyltin (TBT), Chlorothalonil, Dichlofluanid, Sea-Nine 211, Diuron, Irgarol 1051 and Zinc Pyrithione. Restrictions were imposed on the use of TBT, that's why organic booster biocides were recently introduced. The replacement products are generally based on copper metal oxides and organic biocides. This paper provides an overview of the effects of antifouling biocides on aquatic organisms. It will focus on the eight booster biocides in common use, despite little data are available for some of them. Toxicity values and effects of these antifoulants will also be mentioned for different species of fish, crustaceans, invertebrates and algae.
水产养殖的生产基础设施通常是由笼子、网、浮标和绳索等水下组件组成的复杂组合。笼子通常由聚酰胺或高密度聚乙烯(PEHD)制成。所有这些结构都成为生物污垢的表面。然而,笼子网和支撑基础设施为污垢生物提供了数千平方米的多丝网。这就是为什么在将它们浸入海水之前,应该用防污剂对它们进行涂层处理。它有助于防止网堵塞并延长其使用寿命。水产养殖中的生物污垢是一个特定的问题,有三个主要的负面影响。它会导致网堵塞,从而限制水和氧气的交换。此外,由于水交换不良导致溶解氧水平降低,会增加鱼类的压力水平,降低免疫力,增加患病的脆弱性。此外,污垢造成的额外重量会导致笼子变形和结构疲劳。设备的维护和损失导致行业生产成本增加。杀生物剂是可以抑制或杀死导致生物污垢的微生物的化学物质。水产养殖业的扩张需要使用更多的药物、消毒剂和防污化合物(杀生物剂)来消除水产养殖设施中的微生物。不幸的是,杀生物剂在水生环境中的使用已被证明是有害的,因为它对海洋环境有有毒影响。防污涂料中最常用的杀生物剂是三丁基锡(TBT)、百菌清、双氰胺、海-9211、敌草隆、IRGAROL 1051 和吡啶硫酮锌。由于 TBT 的使用受到限制,最近引入了有机增效杀生物剂。替代产品通常基于铜金属氧化物和有机杀生物剂。本文概述了防污杀生物剂对水生生物的影响。它将重点介绍目前常用的八种增效杀生物剂,尽管其中一些杀生物剂的数据很少。还将提到这些防污剂对不同鱼类、甲壳类动物、无脊椎动物和藻类的毒性值和影响。