Kent Michael, García-Deister Vivette, López-Beltrán Carlos, Santos Ricardo Ventura, Schwartz-Marín Ernesto, Wade Peter
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Dec;45(6):839-61. doi: 10.1177/0306312715611262.
This article explores the relationship between genetic research, nationalism and the construction of collective social identities in Latin America. It makes a comparative analysis of two research projects--the 'Genoma Mexicano' and the 'Homo Brasilis'--both of which sought to establish national and genetic profiles. Both have reproduced and strengthened the idea of their respective nations of focus, incorporating biological elements into debates on social identities. Also, both have placed the unifying figure of the mestizo/mestiço at the heart of national identity constructions, and in so doing have displaced alternative identity categories, such as those based on race. However, having been developed in different national contexts, these projects have had distinct scientific and social trajectories: in Mexico, the genomic mestizo is mobilized mainly in relation to health, while in Brazil the key arena is that of race. We show the importance of the nation as a frame for mobilizing genetic data in public policy debates, and demonstrate how race comes in and out of focus in different Latin American national contexts of genomic research, while never completely disappearing.
本文探讨了拉丁美洲基因研究、民族主义与集体社会身份建构之间的关系。它对两个研究项目——“墨西哥基因组计划”和“巴西人计划”——进行了比较分析,这两个项目都试图建立国家和基因概况。两者都再现并强化了各自关注国家的理念,将生物元素纳入社会身份的辩论中。此外,两者都将混血儿这一统一形象置于国家身份建构的核心,在此过程中取代了其他身份类别,比如基于种族的身份类别。然而,由于是在不同的国家背景下开展的,这些项目有着不同的科学和社会轨迹:在墨西哥,基因组混血儿主要在健康方面被提及,而在巴西,关键领域则是种族问题。我们展示了国家作为在公共政策辩论中调动基因数据的框架的重要性,并说明了在拉丁美洲不同的基因组研究国家背景下,种族是如何时而成为焦点、时而不再受关注的,但其从未完全消失。