Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 16;6(2):e17063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017063.
Based on pre-DNA racial/color methodology, clinical and pharmacological trials have traditionally considered the different geographical regions of Brazil as being very heterogeneous. We wished to ascertain how such diversity of regional color categories correlated with ancestry. Using a panel of 40 validated ancestry-informative insertion-deletion DNA polymorphisms we estimated individually the European, African and Amerindian ancestry components of 934 self-categorized White, Brown or Black Brazilians from the four most populous regions of the Country. We unraveled great ancestral diversity between and within the different regions. Especially, color categories in the northern part of Brazil diverged significantly in their ancestry proportions from their counterparts in the southern part of the Country, indicating that diverse regional semantics were being used in the self-classification as White, Brown or Black. To circumvent these regional subjective differences in color perception, we estimated the general ancestry proportions of each of the four regions in a form independent of color considerations. For that, we multiplied the proportions of a given ancestry in a given color category by the official census information about the proportion of that color category in the specific region, to arrive at a "total ancestry" estimate. Once such a calculation was performed, there emerged a much higher level of uniformity than previously expected. In all regions studied, the European ancestry was predominant, with proportions ranging from 60.6% in the Northeast to 77.7% in the South. We propose that the immigration of six million Europeans to Brazil in the 19th and 20th centuries--a phenomenon described and intended as the "whitening of Brazil"--is in large part responsible for dissipating previous ancestry dissimilarities that reflected region-specific population histories. These findings, of both clinical and sociological importance for Brazil, should also be relevant to other countries with ancestrally admixed populations.
基于 DNA 种族/肤色分类法之前的方法,临床和药理学试验传统上认为巴西的不同地理区域非常多样化。我们想确定区域颜色分类的多样性与祖先有何关联。使用 40 个经过验证的具有祖先信息的插入-缺失 DNA 多态性,我们估计了来自该国四个人口最多地区的 934 名自我分类的白人、棕色或黑人巴西人的欧洲、非洲和美洲原住民祖先成分。我们发现不同地区之间和内部存在很大的祖先多样性。特别是,巴西北部的颜色类别在其祖先比例方面与该国南部的颜色类别明显不同,这表明在自我分类为白人、棕色或黑人时,使用了不同的区域语义。为了避免这种颜色感知的区域主观差异,我们以不考虑颜色的形式估计了每个区域的一般祖先比例。为此,我们将给定颜色类别的给定祖先的比例乘以特定区域该颜色类别的官方人口普查信息,以得出“总祖先”估计值。一旦进行了这样的计算,就会出现比预期更高的一致性水平。在所研究的所有地区,欧洲祖先都占主导地位,比例从东北部的 60.6%到南部的 77.7%不等。我们提出,19 世纪和 20 世纪六百万欧洲人移民到巴西——这一现象被描述为并意图为“巴西的白化”——在很大程度上导致了以前反映特定地区人口历史的祖先差异的消散。这些发现对巴西具有临床和社会学意义,也应该与其他具有祖先混合人口的国家相关。