Denison Hayley J, Curtis Elizabeth M, Clynes Michael A, Bromhead Collette, Dennison Elaine M, Grainger Rebecca
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Nov;35(11):2639-2648. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3364-0. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an inflammatory spondyloarthritis occurring after infection at a distant site. Chlamydia trachomatis is proposed to be the most common cause of ReA, yet the incidence of sexually acquired ReA (SARA) has not been well established. We therefore carried out a systematic literature review to collate and critically evaluate the published evidence regarding the incidence of SARA. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using free-text and MeSH terms relating to infection and ReA. The title and abstract of articles returned were screened independently by two reviewers and potentially relevant articles assessed in full. Data was extracted from relevant articles and a risk of bias assessment carried out using a validated tool. Heterogeneity of study methodology and results precluded meta-analysis. The search yielded a total of 11,680 articles, and a further 17 were identified from review articles. After screening, 55 papers were assessed in full, from which 3 met the relevant inclusion criteria for the review. The studies reported an incidence of SARA of 3.0-8.1 % and were found to be of low to moderate quality. More studies are required to address the lack of data regarding the incidence of SARA. Specific and sensitive classification criteria must be developed in order for consistent classification and valid conclusions to be drawn. In clinical practice, it is recommended clinicians discuss the possibility of ReA developing at the time of STI diagnosis and to encourage patients to return if they experience any relevant symptoms.
反应性关节炎(ReA)是一种在远处部位感染后发生的炎性脊柱关节炎。沙眼衣原体被认为是ReA最常见的病因,但性传播获得性反应性关节炎(SARA)的发病率尚未得到充分证实。因此,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以整理和批判性评估关于SARA发病率的已发表证据。使用与感染和ReA相关的自由文本和医学主题词(MeSH)检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库。两名评审员独立筛选返回文章的标题和摘要,并对潜在相关文章进行全文评估。从相关文章中提取数据,并使用经过验证的工具进行偏倚风险评估。研究方法和结果的异质性排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性。检索共得到11,680篇文章,从综述文章中又识别出17篇。筛选后,对55篇论文进行了全文评估,其中3篇符合综述的相关纳入标准。这些研究报告的SARA发病率为3.0%-8.1%,质量被评为低到中等。需要更多的研究来解决关于SARA发病率的数据缺乏问题。必须制定具体且敏感的分类标准,以便进行一致的分类并得出有效的结论。在临床实践中,建议临床医生在性传播感染诊断时讨论发生ReA的可能性,并鼓励患者如果出现任何相关症状及时复诊。