Cohen-Goldberg Ariel M
Lang Speech. 2015 Dec;58(Pt 4):522-48. doi: 10.1177/0023830914567168.
Phonological theories differ as to whether phonological knowledge is abstract (e.g., phonemic), concrete (e.g., exemplar-based), or some combination of the two. The abstractness/concreteness of phonological knowledge was examined by analyzing the process of /r/-sandhi in two corpora of spoken English. Two predictions of exemplar-based theories were examined: the extent to which a word manifests a particular sound pattern like /r/-deletion should be influenced by (1) its lexical frequency and (2) its distribution in the language with respect to the sound pattern's conditioning environment. Lexical frequency was found to influence /r/-sandhi in a corpus of rhotic American English but not in a corpus of predominantly non-rhotic British English. No effect of a word's long-term distribution was found in either corpus. These results support theories proposing that phonological knowledge is both word-specific and abstract and indicate that speakers do not store all phonetic detail that is in principle available to them. The factors that may favor the use of word-specific versus abstract representations are discussed.
语音理论在语音知识是抽象的(例如,音素的)、具体的(例如,基于范例的)还是两者的某种结合这一问题上存在差异。通过分析两个英语口语语料库中的/r/连读过程,研究了语音知识的抽象性/具体性。检验了基于范例理论的两个预测:一个单词表现出特定语音模式(如/r/省略)的程度应该受到(1)其词汇频率和(2)其在语言中相对于该语音模式的条件环境的分布的影响。研究发现,词汇频率对有/r/音的美国英语语料库中的/r/连读有影响,但对主要无/r/音的英国英语语料库没有影响。在这两个语料库中均未发现单词长期分布的影响。这些结果支持了提出语音知识既是特定于单词的又是抽象的理论,并表明说话者不会存储原则上对他们可用的所有语音细节。讨论了可能有利于使用特定于单词的表征与抽象表征的因素。