Suppr超能文献

在直接入院和转院的情况下,高容量中心进行胸主动脉夹层急诊开放修复后的结果有所改善。

Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct admissions and transfers.

作者信息

Merlo Aurelie E, Chauhan Dhaval, Pettit Chris, Hong Kimberly N, Saunders Craig R, Chen Chunguang, Russo Mark J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Clinical Research Unit, Barnabas Heart Hospitals, Newark, NJ, USA.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug 2;11(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0529-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is (1) to define the proportion of patients undergoing emergent open repair of thoracic aortic dissection admitted directly through the emergency room versus those transferred from outside hospitals and (2) to determine if a volume-outcomes relationship exists for those patients across admission types.

METHODS

De-identified patient-level data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004-2008). Patients undergoing emergent aortic surgery for thoracic aortic dissection (n = 1,507) were identified by ICD-9 codes and stratified by annual center volume into low volume (≤5 cases/year) (n = 963; 63.9 %), intermediate volume (6-10 cases/year) (n = 370; 24.5 %), and high volume (≥11 cases/year) (n = 174; 11.6 %) groups. The analysis was further stratified by admission type: direct admission (DA), transfer admission (TA), and other. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed comparing outcomes between high vs low and high vs intermediate volume centers.

RESULTS

Overall in-hospital mortality was 21.8 % (n = 328/1,507). Absolute percent mortality at high volume centers was significantly lower (12.6 %) than at medium (20.6 %) and low volume (23.9 %) centers. For DA patients, mortality was 10.6, 21.4, and 24.0 % for high, medium, and low volume centers respectively. For TA patients, mortality was 10.2, 12.7, and 23.5 % for high, medium, and low volume centers, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that patients in low volume center were more likely to die compared to high volume center (Odds Ratio 2.06, 95 % CI 1.25 - 3.38, p = 0.004). Admission source was not associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct admissions comprise the largest proportion of dissections regardless of volume strata, and they comprise the largest proportion in the low and intermediate volume cohorts. Admission to low volume center is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. Patients transferred to high volume centers from low volume centers have similar outcome as direct admits in terms of mortality.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是:(1)确定直接通过急诊室收治的胸主动脉夹层急诊开放修复患者与从外院转入患者的比例;(2)确定这些不同入院类型的患者是否存在手术量-预后关系。

方法

从全国住院患者样本(2004 - 2008年)中获取去识别化的患者层面数据。通过国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码识别接受胸主动脉夹层急诊主动脉手术的患者(n = 1507),并按年度中心手术量分层为低手术量组(≤5例/年)(n = 963;63.9%)、中等手术量组(6 - 10例/年)(n = 370;24.5%)和高手术量组(≥11例/年)(n = 174;11.6%)。分析进一步按入院类型分层:直接入院(DA)、转院入院(TA)和其他。主要结局是院内死亡率。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,比较高手术量中心与低手术量中心以及高手术量中心与中等手术量中心之间的预后情况。

结果

总体院内死亡率为21.8%(n = 328/1507)。高手术量中心的绝对死亡率(12.6%)显著低于中等手术量中心(20.6%)和低手术量中心(23.9%)。对于直接入院患者,高、中、低手术量中心的死亡率分别为10.6%、21.4%和24.0%。对于转院入院患者,高、中、低手术量中心的死亡率分别为10.2%、12.7%和23.5%。多因素分析表明,与高手术量中心相比,低手术量中心的患者死亡可能性更大(比值比2.06,95%可信区间1.25 - 3.38,p = 0.004)。入院来源与死亡率增加无关。

结论

无论手术量分层如何,直接入院患者在夹层患者中占比最大,在低手术量和中等手术量队列中占比也最大。入住低手术量中心是死亡率增加的独立危险因素。从低手术量中心转入高手术量中心的患者在死亡率方面与直接入院患者预后相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abcb/4969670/9ff892315af7/13019_2016_529_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验