Auffermann W, Olofsson P A, Rabahie G N, Tavares N J, Stoney R J, Higgins C B
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
Radiology. 1989 Aug;172(2):359-62. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.2.2748815.
The magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of normal aortic graft healing were compared with those of perigraft infection in 57 patients after aortic graft implantation. Thirty-three patients without postoperative complications underwent MR imaging in a 0.35-T unit 1 week after graft implantation, and 13 of those patients were reexamined 2-3 months after graft implantation. Twenty-four patients with clinically suspected perigraft infection underwent MR imaging 6 weeks to 18 years after graft implantation. Early normal postoperative changes were characterized by a perigraft collar of low to medium signal intensity on T1-weighted images and of high intensity on T2-weighted images in all 33 cases, consistent with perigraft fluid collection. In 10 of 13 patients reexamined 2-3 months postoperatively, the MR images demonstrated a collar of tissue consistent with perigraft fibrosis. In cases of clinical suspicion of retroperitoneal graft infection, MR imaging showed eccentric fluid collections of low to medium signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high intensity on T2-weighted images at more than 3 months after surgery. The MR findings were diagnostic of retroperitoneal perigraft infection in 17 of 20 patients shown to be infected at surgery. Retroperitoneal infection was correctly excluded on the basis of MR findings in four patients. Thus, MR imaging is an accurate imaging method for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection. In the early postoperative phase, resolving perigraft fluid cannot be differentiated from perigraft infection.