• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一对一志愿者支持对精神病患者的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。

Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582
PMID:27489153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4985859/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Social isolation is common in patients with psychosis and associated with a number of negative outcomes. Programmes in which volunteers provide one-to-one support-often referred to as befriending-have been reputed to achieve favourable outcomes. However, trial-based evidence for their effectiveness is limited.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of one-to-one volunteer support with an active control condition for patients with psychosis over a 1-year period. Patients in the intervention group will receive the support of a volunteer for 1 year, who will meet them weekly and engage them in social and recreational activities. Patients in the control group will not receive support from a volunteer. In both groups, patients will be given a booklet detailing locally available social activities and otherwise receive treatment as usual. Patients, volunteers, clinicians and researchers involved in the delivery of the intervention will not be blinded to group assignment, while researchers carrying out data collection will be blinded. Data collection will be conducted at baseline, at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the amount of time spent engaging in social activities per day. Secondary outcomes include symptoms, quality of life, self-esteem and costs of care. Attitudes of volunteers towards mentally ill people will be assessed. Finally, in-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and volunteers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London-Camden & Kings Cross (reference 15/LO/0674). The findings of the trial will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals and in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) journals library, and presented at scientific conferences. In addition, findings will be summarised for a lay audience and circulated to all relevant National Health Service (NHS) and voluntary organisations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14021839; Pre-results.

摘要

介绍

精神分裂症患者普遍存在社会孤立现象,这种现象与许多负面后果有关。志愿者提供一对一支持的项目——通常被称为“交友”——被认为可以取得有利的结果。然而,基于试验的证据对此类项目的有效性有限。

方法和分析

这是一项随机对照试验,比较了精神分裂症患者在 1 年内接受一对一志愿者支持与积极对照条件的效果。干预组的患者将接受志愿者的支持 1 年,志愿者将每周与患者见面,并与他们一起参加社交和娱乐活动。对照组的患者不会从志愿者那里得到支持。在两组中,患者都会收到一本详细介绍当地社交活动的小册子,并接受常规治疗。参与干预措施实施的患者、志愿者、临床医生和研究人员不会对分组情况进行盲法处理,而进行数据收集的研究人员将进行盲法处理。数据收集将在基线、6 个月和 12 个月进行。主要结果是每天参与社交活动的时间量。次要结果包括症状、生活质量、自尊和护理费用。还将评估志愿者对精神疾病患者的态度。最后,将对患者和志愿者进行深入访谈。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得国家研究伦理服务(NRES)委员会伦敦-卡姆登和国王十字(参考 15/LO/0674)的批准。试验结果将在开放获取同行评议期刊和国家卫生研究所(NIHR)期刊图书馆发表,并在科学会议上展示。此外,研究结果将为非专业观众进行总结,并分发给所有相关的国家卫生服务(NHS)和志愿组织。

试验注册号

ISRCTN14021839;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b587/4985859/5cfa95d77723/bmjopen2016011582f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b587/4985859/5cfa95d77723/bmjopen2016011582f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b587/4985859/5cfa95d77723/bmjopen2016011582f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一对一志愿者支持对精神病患者的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582.
2
One-to-one befriending for people with intellectual disability and symptoms of depression: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.一对一交友对有智力残疾和抑郁症状的人的影响:一项试点随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e033989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033989.
3
Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT).一项在线随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估针对精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的同伴支持自我管理干预措施(亲属教育与应对工具包,REACT)的临床效果和成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 18;7(7):e016965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965.
4
Social network intervention for loneliness and social isolation in a community setting: the PALS cluster-RCT.社区环境中针对孤独感和社交隔离的社交网络干预:PALS 整群随机对照试验
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar;13(1):1-86. doi: 10.3310/WTJH4379.
5
6
App to support Recovery in Early Intervention Services (ARIES) study: protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a self-management Smartphone application for psychosis.应用程序支持早期干预服务 (ARIES) 研究:一项针对精神分裂症自我管理智能手机应用程序的可行性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e025823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025823.
7
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.
8
Effectiveness of a volunteer befriending programme for patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial.志愿者陪伴计划对精神分裂症患者的有效性:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;217(3):477-483. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.42.
9
A contingency management intervention to reduce cannabis use and time to relapse in early psychosis: the CIRCLE RCT.一项旨在减少早期精神病患者大麻使用和复发时间的权变管理干预措施:CIRCLE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(45):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta23450.
10
Psychological intervention, antipsychotic medication or a combined treatment for adolescents with a first episode of psychosis: the MAPS feasibility three-arm RCT.心理干预、抗精神病药物或联合治疗对首发精神病的青少年:MAPS 可行性三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(4):1-124. doi: 10.3310/hta25040.

引用本文的文献

1
Participation in leisure activities and quality of life of people with psychosis in England: a multi-site cross-sectional study.英格兰精神病患者的休闲活动参与情况与生活质量:一项多中心横断面研究。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 13;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00438-1.
2
An Intervention to Connect Patients With Psychosis and Volunteers via Smartphone (the Phone Pal): Development Study.一项通过智能手机将精神病患者与志愿者联系起来的干预措施(电话伙伴):发展研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 2;6(6):e35086. doi: 10.2196/35086.
3
Volunteering Smart-Phone for People With Psychosis-Protocol of a Feasibility Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
To befriend or to be a friend: a systematic review of the meaning and practice of "befriending" in mental health care.成为朋友或拥有朋友:对心理健康护理中“交友”的意义与实践的系统评价
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):71-7. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1021901. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
The Effectiveness of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution-Focused Approach (DIALOG+) for Patients with Psychosis: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial in Community Care.以问题解决为导向的患者为中心评估(DIALOG+)对精神病患者的疗效:社区护理中的实用集群随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(5):304-13. doi: 10.1159/000430991. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
针对精神病患者的智能手机志愿服务——一项可行性试验的方案
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 30;12:742202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.742202. eCollection 2021.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对精神病患者的结构化社会辅导干预措施(SCENE)的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 13;11(12):e050627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050627.
5
Patient and befriender experiences of participating in a befriending programme for adults with psychosis: a qualitative study.患者和陪伴者参与成人精神病陪伴计划的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02776-w.
6
One-to-one befriending for people with intellectual disability and symptoms of depression: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.一对一交友对有智力残疾和抑郁症状的人的影响:一项试点随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e033989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033989.
7
How would patients with psychosis like to be in contact with a volunteer: Face-to-face or digitally?精神病患者希望如何与志愿者接触:面对面还是数字化?
PLoS One. 2019 May 16;14(5):e0216929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216929. eCollection 2019.
8
Effectiveness of a volunteer befriending programme for patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial.志愿者陪伴计划对精神分裂症患者的有效性:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;217(3):477-483. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.42.
9
Characteristics, motivations and experiences of volunteer befrienders for people with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.志愿者陪伴精神疾病患者:特征、动机和经验的系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1960-z.
10
Characteristics and motivations of volunteers providing one-to-one support for people with mental illness: a survey in Austria.为精神疾病患者提供一对一支持的志愿者的特征和动机:奥地利的一项调查。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;53(8):841-847. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1514-1. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Do attitudes towards persons with mental illness worsen during the course of life? An age-period-cohort analysis.
对精神疾病患者的态度会随着人生历程而恶化吗?一项年龄-时期-队列分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Nov;132(5):357-64. doi: 10.1111/acps.12401. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
4
Comparing time use in individuals at different stages of psychosis and a non-clinical comparison group.比较处于精神病不同阶段的个体以及非临床对照组的时间使用情况。
Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): final development and validation.阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS):最终的开发和验证。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):165-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109.
6
Friends and symptom dimensions in patients with psychosis: a pooled analysis.精神病患者的朋友和症状维度:一项汇总分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050119. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).新的 EQ-5D 五维版本(EQ-5D-5L)的制定和初步测试。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
8
Effects of befriending on depressive symptoms and distress: systematic review and meta-analysis.友伴关系对抑郁症状和痛苦的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;196(2):96-101. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.064089.
9
Compeer friends: a qualitative study of a volunteer friendship programme for people with serious mental illness.同伴朋友:一项针对重度精神疾病患者的志愿者友谊项目的定性研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;55(4):291-305. doi: 10.1177/0020764008097090.
10
Objective social outcomes index (SIX): a method to summarise objective indicators of social outcomes in mental health care.客观社会结果指数(SIX):一种总结精神卫生保健中社会结果客观指标的方法。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Jul;118(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01217.x.