McDougall A, Goldszmidt M, Kinsella E A, Smith S, Lingard L
Health & Rehabilitation Sciences-Health Professional Education, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Dept. of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Despite calls for more interprofessional and intraprofessional team-based approaches in healthcare, we lack sufficient understanding of how this happens in the context of patient care teams. This multi-perspective, team-based interview study examined how medical teams negotiated collaborative tensions. From 2011 to 2013, 50 patients across five sites in three Canadian provinces were interviewed about their care experiences and were asked to identify members of their health care teams. Patient-identified team members were subsequently interviewed to form 50 "Team Sampling Units" (TSUs), consisting of 209 interviews with patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. Results are gathered from a focused analysis of 13 TSUs where intraprofessional collaborative tensions involved treating fluid overload, or edema, a common HF symptom. Drawing on actor-network theory (ANT), the analysis focused on intraprofessional collaboration between specialty care teams in cardiology and nephrology. The study found that despite a shared narrative of common purpose between cardiology teams and nephrology teams, fluid management tools and techniques formed sites of collaborative tension. In particular, care activities involved asynchronous clinical interpretations, geographically distributed specialist care, fragmented forms of communication, and uncertainty due to clinical complexity. Teams 'disentangled' fluid in order to focus on its physiological function and mobilisation. Teams also used distinct 'framings' of fluid management that created perceived collaborative tensions. This study advances collaborative entanglement as a conceptual framework for understanding, teaching, and potentially ameliorating some of the tensions that manifest during intraprofessional care for patients with complex, chronic disease.
尽管医疗保健领域呼吁采用更多跨专业和专业内基于团队的方法,但我们对在患者护理团队背景下这种情况如何发生缺乏足够的了解。这项基于团队的多视角访谈研究考察了医疗团队如何应对协作中的紧张关系。2011年至2013年期间,对加拿大三个省份五个地点的50名患者进行了访谈,询问他们的护理经历,并要求他们指出其医疗团队的成员。随后,对患者指定的团队成员进行了访谈,形成了50个“团队抽样单位”(TSU),包括对患者、护理人员和医疗服务提供者的209次访谈。结果来自对13个TSU的重点分析,其中专业内协作紧张关系涉及治疗液体过载或水肿,这是心力衰竭的常见症状。借鉴行动者网络理论(ANT),分析聚焦于心脏病学和肾脏病学专科护理团队之间的专业内协作。研究发现,尽管心脏病学团队和肾脏病学团队在共同目标上有共同的叙述,但液体管理工具和技术形成了协作紧张的焦点。特别是,护理活动涉及异步临床解读、地理上分散的专科护理、零散的沟通形式以及由于临床复杂性导致的不确定性。团队对液体进行“拆解”,以便专注于其生理功能和流动。团队还使用了不同的液体管理“框架设定”,这造成了可感知的协作紧张关系。本研究将协作纠缠作为一个概念框架进行推进,以理解、教授并可能缓解在为患有复杂慢性病的患者提供专业内护理期间出现的一些紧张关系。