Gruner Patricia, Pittenger Christopher
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, United States; Learning Based Recovery Center, VA Connecticut Health System, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, United States; Department of Psychology, Yale University, United States; Child Study Center, Yale University, United States; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, United States.
Neuroscience. 2017 Mar 14;345:243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is characterized by maladaptive patterns of repetitive, inflexible cognition and behavior that suggest a lack of cognitive flexibility. Consistent with this clinical observation, many neurocognitive studies suggest behavioral and neurobiological abnormalities in cognitive flexibility in individuals with OCD. Meta-analytic reviews support a pattern of cognitive inflexibility, with effect sizes generally in the medium range. Heterogeneity in assessments and the way underlying constructs have been operationalized point to the need for better standardization across studies, as well as more refined overarching models of cognitive flexibility and executive function (EF). Neuropsychological assessments of cognitive flexibility include measures of attentional set shifting, reversal and alternation, cued task-switching paradigms, cognitive control measures such as the Trail-Making and Stroop tasks, and several measures of motor inhibition. Differences in the cognitive constructs and neural substrates associated with these measures suggest that performance within these different domains should be examined separately. Additional factors, such as the number of consistent trials prior to a shift and whether a shift is explicitly signaled or must be inferred from a change in reward contingencies, may influence performance, and thus mask or accentuate deficits. Several studies have described abnormalities in neural activation in the absence of differences in behavioral performance, suggesting that our behavioral probes may not be adequately sensitive, but also offering important insights into potential compensatory processes. The fact that deficits of moderate effect size are seen across a broad range of classic neuropsychological tests in OCD presents a conceptual challenge, as clinical symptomatology suggests greater specificity. Traditional cognitive probes may not be sufficient to delineate specific domains of deficit in this and other neuropsychiatric disorders; a new generation of behavioral tasks that test more specific underlying constructs, supplemented by neuroimaging to provide insight into the underlying processes, may be needed.
强迫症(OCD)的特征是重复、僵化的认知和行为模式出现适应不良,这表明缺乏认知灵活性。与这一临床观察结果一致,许多神经认知研究表明,强迫症患者在认知灵活性方面存在行为和神经生物学异常。荟萃分析综述支持认知僵化的模式,效应大小一般处于中等范围。评估的异质性以及潜在结构的操作方式表明,各研究需要更好地实现标准化,同时需要更精细的认知灵活性和执行功能(EF)总体模型。对认知灵活性的神经心理学评估包括注意力集转换、反转和交替的测量、线索任务切换范式、诸如连线测验和斯特鲁普任务等认知控制测量,以及几种运动抑制测量。与这些测量相关的认知结构和神经基质的差异表明,应分别检查这些不同领域内的表现。其他因素,如转换前一致试验的次数以及转换是明确发出信号还是必须从奖励意外情况的变化中推断出来,可能会影响表现,从而掩盖或加剧缺陷。几项研究描述了在行为表现无差异的情况下神经激活的异常,这表明我们的行为探测可能不够灵敏,但也为潜在的代偿过程提供了重要见解。强迫症患者在广泛的经典神经心理学测试中都出现了中等效应大小的缺陷,这一事实提出了一个概念上的挑战,因为临床症状表明存在更大的特异性。传统的认知探测可能不足以界定这种疾病和其他神经精神疾病中特定的缺陷领域;可能需要新一代测试更具体潜在结构的行为任务,并辅以神经影像学来深入了解潜在过程。