Azzarello Antonino, Hoest Thomas, Hay-Schmidt Anders, Mikkelsen Anne Lis
Holbaek Fertility Clinic, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbaek, Denmark.
Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, København N, Denmark.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Oct;33(10):1337-1342. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0737-x. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
To investigate whether the presence of large fragment (LF) and abnormal cell divisions (ACDs) has influenced the correlation between live birth rate and number of blastomeres detected on day 2 by conventional scoring.
This study included 578 embryos cultured in time lapse and selected for transfer by conventional scoring on day 2. By time-lapse recordings, embryos were reassessed to identify ACDs and/or LFs mistaken as blastomeres. The latter identifications were used to recalculate fragmentation rate and the number of blastomeres. Life birth rate according to number of blastomeres was compared in (a) embryos selected by conventional scoring and (b) embryos reassessed by time lapse.
After conventional scoring, embryos with four cells had a significantly higher pregnancy rate than embryos with less than four cells and embryos with more than four cells. By time-lapse assessment, ACDs and/or recalculated fragmentation >25 % was recognized in 106/578 (18.3 %) of transferred embryos. None of them resulted in a live birth. After exclusion of these embryos, the number of blastomeres on the day of transfer did not have any impact on life birth rate.
Conventional scoring on day 2 did not detect ACDs and LFs mistaken as blastomeres. LFs can lead to a recalculated fragmentation rate to >25 %. No significant correlation between live birth rate and number of blastomeres in day 2 embryos was observed when embryos with ACDs and fragmentation >25 % were excluded. Recognition of ACDs and fragmentation >25 % is more predictive of live birth than number of blastomeres.
研究大碎片(LF)和异常细胞分裂(ACD)的存在是否影响了通过传统评分在第2天检测到的卵裂球数量与活产率之间的相关性。
本研究纳入了578个经延时培养并在第2天通过传统评分选择用于移植的胚胎。通过延时记录,对胚胎进行重新评估以识别被误判为卵裂球的ACD和/或LF。利用后者的识别结果重新计算碎片率和卵裂球数量。比较了(a)通过传统评分选择的胚胎和(b)通过延时重新评估的胚胎中根据卵裂球数量的活产率。
传统评分后,具有4个细胞的胚胎的妊娠率显著高于细胞数少于4个和多于4个的胚胎。通过延时评估,在106/578(18.3%)的移植胚胎中识别出ACD和/或重新计算的碎片率>25%。它们均未导致活产。排除这些胚胎后,移植当天的卵裂球数量对活产率没有任何影响。
第2天的传统评分未检测到被误判为卵裂球的ACD和LF。LF可导致重新计算的碎片率>25%。当排除具有ACD和碎片率>25%的胚胎时,未观察到第2天胚胎的活产率与卵裂球数量之间存在显著相关性。识别ACD和碎片率>25%比卵裂球数量更能预测活产。