Son Joung A, Jung Chan Sik, Han Hye Rim
Division of Forest Insect Pests and Diseases, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea.
Plant Pathol J. 2016 Aug;32(4):340-6. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2016.0025. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
To understand how Bursaphelenchus xylophilus kills pine trees, the differences between the effects of B. xylophilus and B. mucronatus on pine trees are usually compared. In this study, the migration and attacking ability of a non-pathogenic B. mucronatus in Pinus thunbergii were investigated. The distribution of B. mucronatus and the number of dead epithelial cells resulting from inoculation were compared with those of the pathogenic B. xylophilus. Although B. mucronatus is non-pathogenic in pines, its distribution pattern in P. thunbergii was the same as that of B. xylophilus. We therefore concluded that the non-pathogenicity of B. mucronatus could not be attributed to its migration ability. The sparse and sporadic attacking pattern of B. mucronatus was also the same as that of B. xylophilus. However, the number and area of the dead epithelial cells in pine cuttings inoculated with B. mucronatus were smaller than in those cuttings inoculated with B. xylophilus, meaning that the attacking ability of B. mucronatus is weaker than that of B. xylophilus. Therefore, we concluded that the weaker attacking ability of B. mucronatus might be the factor responsible for the non-pathogenicity.
为了解松材线虫如何杀死松树,通常会比较松材线虫和拟松材线虫对松树影响的差异。在本研究中,对非致病性拟松材线虫在黑松中的迁移和侵袭能力进行了调查。将拟松材线虫的分布情况以及接种后导致的死亡上皮细胞数量与致病性松材线虫的情况进行了比较。尽管拟松材线虫在松树中无致病性,但其在黑松中的分布模式与松材线虫相同。因此,我们得出结论,拟松材线虫的无致病性不能归因于其迁移能力。拟松材线虫稀疏且零星的侵袭模式也与松材线虫相同。然而,接种拟松材线虫的松树插条中死亡上皮细胞的数量和面积比接种松材线虫的插条中的要小,这意味着拟松材线虫的侵袭能力比松材线虫弱。因此,我们得出结论,拟松材线虫较弱的侵袭能力可能是其无致病性的原因。