Suppr超能文献

支气管镜检查期间的镇静:一项全国性镇静与监测调查的数据

Sedation during bronchoscopy: data from a nationwide sedation and monitoring survey.

作者信息

Gaisl Thomas, Bratton Daniel J, Heuss Ludwig T, Kohler Malcolm, Schlatzer Christian, Zalunardo Marco P, Frey Martin, Franzen Daniel

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Spital Zollikerberg, Zollikerberg, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 5;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0275-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge on practice patterns in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), the use of propofol, and monitoring during flexible bronchoscopy (FB). The purpose of this study was to assess the current practice patterns of FBs and to focus on the use of propofol, the education of the proceduralist, and the involvement of anaesthesiologists during FB.

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 299 pulmonologists. Only respondents who were active physicians in adult respiratory medicine performing FB were subsequently analysed.

RESULTS

The response rate was 78 % and 27,149 FB in the previous 12 months were analysed. The overall sedation-related morbidity rate was 0.02 % and mortality was 7/100'000 FB. Sedation was used in 95 % of bronchoscopies. The main drugs used for PSA were propofol (77 %) and midazolam (46 %). In 84 % of PSAs propofol was used without the attendance of an anaesthesiologist. The use of propofol was associated with high volume bronchoscopists (p < 0.010) and career-young pulmonologists (p < 0.001). While monitoring vital parameters has become standard practice, pulmonologists reported a very low rate of systematic basic education and training in the field of PSA (50 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In Switzerland, PSA during FB is mostly performed with propofol without the attendance of an anaesthesiologist and the use of this drug is expected to increase in the future. While monitoring standards are very high there is need for policies to improve education, systematic training, and support for pulmonologists for PSA during FB.

摘要

背景

关于程序性镇静镇痛(PSA)的实践模式、丙泊酚的使用以及在可弯曲支气管镜检查(FB)期间的监测,目前了解有限。本研究的目的是评估当前FB的实践模式,并关注丙泊酚的使用、操作医生的培训以及麻醉医生在FB期间的参与情况。

方法

向299名肺科医生发送了一份匿名调查问卷。随后仅对那些在成人呼吸医学领域从事FB的在职医生的回复进行分析。

结果

回复率为78%,并对过去12个月内的27149例FB进行了分析。总体镇静相关发病率为0.02%,死亡率为每10万例FB中有7例。95%的支气管镜检查使用了镇静。用于PSA的主要药物是丙泊酚(77%)和咪达唑仑(46%)。在84%的PSA中,丙泊酚是在没有麻醉医生在场的情况下使用的。丙泊酚的使用与大量进行支气管镜检查的医生(p<0.010)以及年轻的肺科医生(p<0.001)相关。虽然监测生命参数已成为标准做法,但肺科医生报告在PSA领域接受系统基础教育和培训的比例非常低(50%)。

结论

在瑞士,FB期间的PSA大多使用丙泊酚且没有麻醉医生在场,预计未来这种药物的使用还会增加。虽然监测标准很高,但需要制定政策来改善肺科医生在FB期间进行PSA的教育、系统培训和支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/163b/4974777/24e76cfa1845/12890_2016_275_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验