Cold Kristoffer Mazanti, Svendsen Morten Bo Søndergaard, Bodtger Uffe, Nayahangan Leizl Joy, Clementsen Paul Frost, Konge Lars
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6797-6805. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2181.
Flexible bronchoscopy is a core invasive procedure in pulmonary medicine and training in the procedure is mandatory. Diagnostic completeness and procedure time have been identified as useful measures of competence. No outcome measures have been developed regarding navigational path in bronchoscopy to assess whether the bronchial segments have been identified in an arbitrary or structured order. We investigated whether a new outcome measure for structured progression could be used to assess competency in flexible bronchoscopy.
The study was designed as a prospective comparative study. Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators completed three full bronchoscopies in a simulated setting on a phantom. The following outcome measures were collected through a checklist evaluation by a trained rater: Diagnostic Completeness as amount of visualized bronchial segments, Structured Progress between the bronchial segments in ascending order, and average intersegmental time (AIT).
The ability to follow a structured ascending path through the bronchial tree correlated with a higher amount of identified bronchial segments (Pearson's correlation, r=0.62, P<0.001) and a lower AIT (Pearson's correlation, r=-0.52, P<0.001).
Operators should advance through the bronchial tree in a structured ascending order to ensure systematic progress with the highest level of diagnostic yield and the lowest procedure time. Structured progression is a useful measure to evaluate competency in flexible bronchoscopy.
可弯曲支气管镜检查是肺部医学中的一项核心侵入性操作,该操作的培训是强制性的。诊断完整性和操作时间已被确定为衡量操作能力的有用指标。尚未制定关于支气管镜检查中导航路径的结果指标,以评估支气管段是否按任意顺序或结构化顺序被识别。我们研究了一种新的结构化进展结果指标是否可用于评估可弯曲支气管镜检查的操作能力。
本研究设计为前瞻性比较研究。12名新手、11名中级和10名专家级支气管镜操作人员在模拟环境中对模型完成了三次全支气管镜检查。通过经过培训的评估人员使用检查表进行评估,收集以下结果指标:作为可视化支气管段数量的诊断完整性、支气管段之间按升序排列的结构化进展以及平均节段间时间(AIT)。
沿着支气管树按结构化升序路径操作的能力与更多的已识别支气管段数量相关(Pearson相关性,r = 0.62,P < 0.001)以及更低的AIT相关(Pearson相关性,r = -0.52,P < 0.001)。
操作人员应按结构化升序顺序通过支气管树,以确保以最高的诊断率和最短的操作时间进行系统进展。结构化进展是评估可弯曲支气管镜检查操作能力的有用指标。