Ernst Armin, Wahidi Momen M, Read Charles A, Buckley John D, Addrizzo-Harris Doreen J, Shah Pallav L, Herth Felix J F, de Hoyos Parra Alberto, Ornelas Joseph, Yarmus Lonny, Silvestri Gerard A
Reliant Medical Group and Tufts University, Worcester, MA.
Duke University, Durham, NC.
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):321-332. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0678.
The determination of competency of trainees in programs performing bronchoscopy is quite variable. Some programs provide didactic lectures with hands-on supervision, other programs incorporate advanced simulation centers, whereas others have a checklist approach. Although no single method has been proven best, the variability alone suggests that outcomes are variable. Program directors and certifying bodies need guidance to create standards for training programs. Little well-developed literature on the topic exists.
To provide credible and trustworthy guidance, rigorous methodology has been applied to create this bronchoscopy consensus training statement. All panelists were vetted and approved by the CHEST Guidelines Oversight Committee. Each topic group drafted questions in a PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format. MEDLINE data through PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Manual searches also supplemented the searches. All gathered references were screened for consideration based on inclusion criteria, and all statements were designated as an Ungraded Consensus-Based Statement.
We suggest that professional societies move from a volume-based certification system to skill acquisition and knowledge-based competency assessment for trainees. Bronchoscopy training programs should incorporate multiple tools, including simulation. We suggest that ongoing quality and process improvement systems be introduced and that certifying agencies move from a volume-based certification system to skill acquisition and knowledge-based competency assessment for trainees. We also suggest that assessment of skill maintenance and improvement in practice be evaluated regularly with ongoing quality and process improvement systems after initial skill acquisition.
The current methods used for bronchoscopy competency in training programs are variable. We suggest that professional societies and certifying agencies move from a volume- based certification system to a standardized skill acquisition and knowledge-based competency assessment for pulmonary and thoracic surgery trainees.
在进行支气管镜检查的培训项目中,对学员能力的判定差异很大。一些项目提供理论讲座并进行实践监督,其他项目设有先进的模拟中心,还有一些项目采用清单式方法。尽管没有一种单一方法被证明是最佳的,但这种差异本身就表明结果存在变数。项目主任和认证机构需要指导来制定培训项目的标准。关于该主题的完善文献很少。
为提供可靠且值得信赖的指导,已应用严谨的方法来制定这份支气管镜检查共识培训声明。所有小组成员均经过胸科指南监督委员会的审查和批准。每个主题小组以PICO(人群、干预措施、对照、结局)格式起草问题。通过PubMed和Cochrane图书馆系统检索MEDLINE数据。手工检索也对搜索进行了补充。所有收集到的参考文献均根据纳入标准进行筛选以供考虑,所有声明均被指定为基于共识的未分级声明。
我们建议专业学会从基于数量的认证系统转向针对学员的技能获取和基于知识的能力评估。支气管镜检查培训项目应采用多种工具,包括模拟。我们建议引入持续的质量和流程改进系统,认证机构应从基于数量的认证系统转向针对学员的技能获取和基于知识的能力评估。我们还建议在初始技能获取后,通过持续的质量和流程改进系统定期评估实践中的技能维持和提升情况。
目前培训项目中用于支气管镜检查能力的方法各不相同。我们建议专业学会和认证机构从基于数量的认证系统转向针对胸外科和肺外科培训学员的标准化技能获取和基于知识的能力评估。