Harish Ajith, Abroi Aare, Gough Julian, Kurland Charles
Structural and Molecular Biology Group, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Sweden
Estonian Biocentre, Riia 23, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Aug 27;8(8):2474-81. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw175.
The evolutionary origins of viruses according to marker gene phylogenies, as well as their relationships to the ancestors of host cells remains unclear. In a recent article Nasir and Caetano-Anollés reported that their genome-scale phylogenetic analyses based on genomic composition of protein structural-domains identify an ancient origin of the "viral supergroup" (Nasir et al. 2015. A phylogenomic data-driven exploration of viral origins and evolution. Sci Adv. 1(8):e1500527.). It suggests that viruses and host cells evolved independently from a universal common ancestor. Examination of their data and phylogenetic methods indicates that systematic errors likely affected the results. Reanalysis of the data with additional tests shows that small-genome attraction artifacts distort their phylogenomic analyses, particularly the location of the root of the phylogenetic tree of life that is central to their conclusions. These new results indicate that their suggestion of a distinct ancestry of the viral supergroup is not well supported by the evidence.
根据标记基因系统发育学,病毒的进化起源以及它们与宿主细胞祖先的关系仍不明确。在最近的一篇文章中,纳西尔和卡埃塔诺 - 阿诺莱斯报告称,他们基于蛋白质结构域的基因组组成进行的全基因组系统发育分析确定了“病毒超群”的古老起源(纳西尔等人,2015年。基于系统发育基因组数据驱动的病毒起源与进化探索。《科学进展》。1(8):e1500527)。这表明病毒和宿主细胞是从一个共同的祖先独立进化而来的。对他们的数据和系统发育方法的研究表明,系统误差可能影响了结果。用额外的测试对数据进行重新分析表明,小基因组吸引假象扭曲了他们的系统发育基因组分析,特别是生命系统发育树根部的位置,而这对他们的结论至关重要。这些新结果表明,他们关于病毒超群有独特祖先的观点没有得到证据的充分支持。