Kim Seo W, Kim Hunam, Ryu Yon J, Lee Jin H, Shim Sung S, Kim Yoo K, Chang Jung H
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, South Korea.
Open Respir Med J. 2016 Jun 30;10:36-45. doi: 10.2174/1874306401610010036. eCollection 2016.
Pranlukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that is used as an additional controller of mild to moderate asthma. This study compared the efficacy and side effects of two bioequivalent preparations of pranlukast: original pranlukast (Onon(®); Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan) and a modified formulation of pranlukast (Prakanon(®); Yuhan Co, Korea) in patients with mild to moderate asthma.
Of the 34 subjects screened, 30 patients who were using standard medication to control asthma and scored less than 20 points on the Asthma Control Test(™) (ACT) were assigned randomly to one of the two groups in a prospective, open label, crossover study: group 1 received Prakanon(®) (150 mg/day) and group 2 received Onon(®) (450 mg/day) for 8 weeks each; after a 1-week rest period, the groups were switched to the alternative medication for further 8 weeks and monitored for 2 more weeks without study medication. Evaluation parameters included the ACT, quality of life questionnaire adult Korean asthmatics (QLQAKA), pulmonary function tests, peripheral blood tests, vital signs, and adverse events.
Thirty patients were enrolled and 21 completed the trial: 10 in group 1 and 11 in group 2. The baseline data of the two groups did not differ. No statistical significant differences were observed in efficacy and lung function at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two kinds of pranlukast. The final asthma control rate was 81% with Prakanon(®) and 76% with Onon(®). There were no differences in vital signs and laboratory data at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two drugs. There were no differences in adverse events between the two drugs. The most common side effect was abdominal pain. Drug compliance was high, without differences between the two drugs.
These findings suggest that Prakanon(®) which is an improved formulation of pranlukast at a lower dose than the original formulation, Onon(®), has a similar efficacy and side effect profile in the control of persistent asthma.
普仑司特是一种白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA),用作轻度至中度哮喘的附加控制药物。本研究比较了两种生物等效的普仑司特制剂:原研普仑司特(Onon(®);日本小野制药)和改良型普仑司特(Prakanon(®);韩国韩美药品株式会社)在轻度至中度哮喘患者中的疗效和副作用。
在34名筛选的受试者中,30名正在使用标准药物控制哮喘且哮喘控制测试(ACT)得分低于20分的患者被随机分配到前瞻性、开放标签、交叉研究的两组之一:第1组接受Prakanon(®)(150毫克/天),第2组接受Onon(®)(450毫克/天),每组各治疗8周;经过1周的休息期后,两组换用另一种药物再治疗8周,并在无研究药物的情况下再监测2周。评估参数包括ACT、韩国成年哮喘患者生活质量问卷(QLQAKA)、肺功能测试、外周血测试、生命体征和不良事件。
30名患者入组,21名完成试验:第1组10名,第2组11名。两组的基线数据无差异。两种普仑司特在每次的疗效和肺功能以及与基线值的变化方面均未观察到统计学显著差异。使用Prakanon(®)的最终哮喘控制率为81%,使用Onon(®)的为76%。两种药物在每次的生命体征和实验室数据以及与基线值的变化方面均无差异。两种药物的不良事件无差异。最常见的副作用是腹痛。药物依从性高,两种药物之间无差异。
这些发现表明,Prakanon(®)作为普仑司特的改良制剂,剂量低于原研制剂Onon(®),在控制持续性哮喘方面具有相似的疗效和副作用。