Suppr超能文献

电子患者报告结局在儿科门诊癌症护理中的实际应用

Real-world implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes in outpatient pediatric cancer care.

作者信息

Schepers Sasja A, Sint Nicolaas Simone M, Haverman Lotte, Wensing Michel, Schouten van Meeteren Antoinette Y N, Veening Margreet A, Caron Huib N, Hoogerbrugge Peter M, Kaspers Gertjan J L, Verhaak Christianne M, Grootenhuis Martha A

机构信息

Psychosocial Department, Academic Medical Center/Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):951-959. doi: 10.1002/pon.4242. Epub 2016 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The KLIK method is an online tool that monitors and discusses electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), which has been shown to enhance outcomes. This study aimed (1) to determine the fidelity (ie, extent to which used as intended) of the KLIK method as implemented in outpatient pediatric cancer care and (2) to study health care professional (HCP)-reported barriers and facilitators for implementation.

METHODS

Two hundred five children with newly diagnosed cancer (enrollment rate 85%) participated. At 1 (T1), 3 (T2), and 6 (T3) months after diagnosis, patients (8-18 years) or parents (of patients 0-7 years) completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires, which were transformed into an ePROfile and discussed by their HCP during consultations. Fidelity was determined by the following: percentage of website registrations, HRQoL questionnaires completed, and ePROfiles discussed. Implementation determinants were assessed with HCPs after the final T3 with the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations.

RESULTS

Depending on the time point (T1-T3), fidelity was 86% to 89% for website registration, 66-85% for completed HRQoL questionnaires, and 56% to 62% for ePROfile discussion. Barriers were mainly related to organizational issues (eg, organizational change) and less frequently to users (eg, motivation to comply) or the intervention (compatibility). Facilitators were related to the user (eg, positive outcome expectations) and intervention (simplicity) but not to the organization.

CONCLUSIONS

When implementing ePROs in outpatient pediatric oncology practice, HCPs report determinants that influence ePRO integration. To improve implementation and outcomes, tailored organizational (eg, formal ratification by management and time) and specific local (eg, individualized assessments) strategies should be developed to achieve optimal ePRO discussion.

摘要

目的

KLIK方法是一种监测和讨论电子患者报告结局(ePRO)的在线工具,已被证明可改善结局。本研究旨在:(1)确定KLIK方法在儿科门诊癌症护理中实施的保真度(即按预期使用的程度);(2)研究医疗保健专业人员(HCP)报告的实施障碍和促进因素。

方法

205名新诊断癌症的儿童(入组率85%)参与研究。在诊断后的1个月(T1)、3个月(T2)和6个月(T3),患者(8 - 18岁)或家长(0 - 7岁患者的家长)完成健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)问卷,问卷被转换为ePRO文件,并由其HCP在会诊期间进行讨论。保真度通过以下指标确定:网站注册百分比、完成的HRQoL问卷以及讨论的ePRO文件。在最终的T3之后,使用创新决定因素测量工具对HCP进行实施决定因素评估。

结果

根据时间点(T1 - T3),网站注册的保真度为86%至89%,完成的HRQoL问卷为66% - 85%,ePRO文件讨论为56%至62%。障碍主要与组织问题(如组织变革)有关,较少与用户(如遵守的动机)或干预措施(兼容性)有关。促进因素与用户(如积极的结果期望)和干预措施(简单性)有关,但与组织无关。

结论

在儿科门诊肿瘤学实践中实施ePRO时,HCP报告了影响ePRO整合的决定因素。为了改善实施和结局,应制定量身定制的组织策略(如管理层的正式批准和时间安排)和特定的本地策略(如个性化评估),以实现最佳的ePRO讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验