Nguyen Oanh Kieu, Makam Anil N, Clark Christopher, Zhang Song, Xie Bin, Velasco Ferdinand, Amarasingham Ruben, Halm Ethan A
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Division of Outcomes and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):42-48. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3826-8. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Vital sign instability on discharge could be a clinically objective means of assessing readiness and safety for discharge; however, the association between vital sign instability on discharge and post-hospital outcomes is unclear.
To assess the association between vital sign instability at hospital discharge and post-discharge adverse outcomes.
Multi-center observational cohort study using electronic health record data. Abnormalities in temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were assessed within 24 hours of discharge. We used logistic regression adjusted for predictors of 30-day death and readmission.
Adults (≥18 years) with a hospitalization to any medicine service in 2009-2010 at six hospitals (safety-net, community, teaching, and non-teaching) in north Texas.
Death or non-elective readmission within 30 days after discharge.
Of 32,835 individuals, 18.7 % were discharged with one or more vital sign instabilities. Overall, 12.8 % of individuals with no instabilities on discharge died or were readmitted, compared to 16.9 % with one instability, 21.2 % with two instabilities, and 26.0 % with three or more instabilities (p < 0.001). The presence of any (≥1) instability was associated with higher risk-adjusted odds of either death or readmission (AOR 1.36, 95 % CI 1.26-1.48), and was more strongly associated with death (AOR 2.31, 95 % CI 1.91-2.79). Individuals with three or more instabilities had nearly fourfold increased odds of death (AOR 3.91, 95 % CI 1.69-9.06) and increased odds of 30-day readmission (AOR 1.36, 95 % 0.81-2.30) compared to individuals with no instabilities. Having two or more vital sign instabilities at discharge had a positive predictive value of 22 % and positive likelihood ratio of 1.8 for 30-day death or readmission.
Vital sign instability on discharge is associated with increased risk-adjusted rates of 30-day mortality and readmission. These simple vital sign criteria could be used to assess safety for discharge, and to reduce 30-day mortality and readmissions.
出院时生命体征不稳定可能是评估出院准备情况和安全性的一种临床客观手段;然而,出院时生命体征不稳定与出院后结局之间的关联尚不清楚。
评估出院时生命体征不稳定与出院后不良结局之间的关联。
使用电子健康记录数据的多中心观察性队列研究。在出院后24小时内评估体温、心率、血压、呼吸频率和血氧饱和度的异常情况。我们使用逻辑回归对30天死亡和再入院的预测因素进行了调整。
2009 - 2010年在德克萨斯州北部六家医院(安全网医院、社区医院、教学医院和非教学医院)因任何内科服务住院的成年人(≥18岁)。
出院后30天内的死亡或非选择性再入院。
在32,835名个体中,18.7%出院时存在一项或多项生命体征不稳定。总体而言,出院时无生命体征不稳定的个体中,12.8%死亡或再入院,而出院时存在一项生命体征不稳定的个体中这一比例为16.9%,存在两项不稳定的为21.2%,存在三项或更多项不稳定的为26.0%(p < 0.001)。存在任何(≥1项)不稳定与死亡或再入院的风险调整后较高几率相关(比值比1.36,95%置信区间1.26 - 1.48),且与死亡的相关性更强(比值比2.31,95%置信区间1.91 - 2.79)。与无生命体征不稳定的个体相比,存在三项或更多项不稳定的个体死亡几率增加近四倍(比值比3.91,95%置信区间1.69 - 9.06),30天再入院几率增加(比值比1.36,95%置信区间为0.81 - 2.30)。出院时存在两项或更多项生命体征不稳定对30天死亡或再入院的阳性预测值为22%,阳性似然比为1.8。
出院时生命体征不稳定与30天死亡率和再入院的风险调整率增加相关。这些简单的生命体征标准可用于评估出院安全性,并降低30天死亡率和再入院率。