Moen Vegard Pihl, Drageset Jorunn, Eide Geir Egil, Klokkerud Mari, Gjesdal Sturla
Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Østre Nesttunveg 2, 5221, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):505-514. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1384-5. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability covering six domains. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of the instrument for monitoring disability in specialized somatic rehabilitation by testing reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of WHODAS 2.0, Norwegian version, among patients with various health conditions.
For taxonomy, terminology and definitions, the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments were followed. Reproducibility was investigated by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a randomly selected sample. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form, and fit of the hypothesized structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was evaluated in another randomly selected sample by testing a priori formulated hypotheses.
Nine hundred seventy patients were included in the study. Reproducibility and responsiveness were evaluated in 53 and 104 patients, respectively. The ICC for the WHODAS 2.0 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 and was 0.87 for total score. Cronbach's alpha for domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 and was 0.93 for total score. For construct validity, 6 of 12 expected correlations were confirmed and CFA did not achieve satisfactory fit indices. For responsiveness, 3 of 8 hypotheses were confirmed.
The Norwegian version of WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate to satisfactory reliability and moderate validity in rehabilitation patients. However, the present study indicated possible limitations in terms of responsiveness.
世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0是一种用于评估残疾情况的通用工具,涵盖六个领域。本研究的目的是通过测试WHODAS 2.0挪威语版本在各种健康状况患者中的信度、结构效度和反应度,来探究该工具在专科躯体康复中监测残疾情况的潜力。
在分类法、术语和定义方面,遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准。通过组内相关系数(ICC)在随机抽取的样本中调查可重复性。用Cronbach's α评估内部一致性。通过WHODAS 2.0与医学结局研究36项简表之间的相关性以及使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对假设结构的拟合情况来评估结构效度。在另一个随机抽取的样本中通过检验预先设定的假设来评估反应度。
970名患者纳入本研究。分别在53名和104名患者中评估了可重复性和反应度。WHODAS 2.0各领域的ICC范围为0.63至0.84,总分的ICC为0.87。各领域的Cronbach's α范围为0.75至0.94,总分为0.93。在结构效度方面,12个预期相关性中有6个得到证实,CFA未达到令人满意的拟合指数。在反应度方面,8个假设中有3个得到证实。
WHODAS 2.0挪威语版本在康复患者中显示出中度至令人满意的信度和中度效度。然而,本研究表明该量表在反应度方面可能存在局限性。