• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告结局测量中随时间变化的解读方法。

Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures.

机构信息

United BioSource Corporation, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2013 Apr;22(3):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0175-x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-012-0175-x
PMID:22528240
Abstract

PURPOSE

Interpretation guidelines are needed for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures' change scores to evaluate efficacy of an intervention and to communicate PRO results to regulators, patients, physicians, and providers. The 2009 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims (hereafter referred to as the final FDA PRO Guidance) provides some recommendations for the interpretation of change in PRO scores as evidence of treatment efficacy.

METHODS

This article reviews the evolution of the methods and the terminology used to describe and aid in the communication of meaningful PRO change score thresholds.

RESULTS

Anchor- and distribution-based methods have played important roles, and the FDA has recently stressed the importance of cross-sectional patient global assessments of concept as anchor-based methods for estimation of the responder definition, which describes an individual-level treatment benefit. The final FDA PRO Guidance proposes the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of responses as a useful method to depict the effect of treatments across the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

While CDFs serve an important role, they should not be a replacement for the careful investigation of a PRO's relevant responder definition using anchor-based methods and providing stakeholders with a relevant threshold for the interpretation of change over time.

摘要

目的

需要为患者报告的结局(PRO)测量的变化分数提供解释指南,以评估干预措施的疗效,并向监管机构、患者、医生和提供者传达 PRO 结果。2009 年食品和药物管理局(FDA)关于行业患者报告的结局(PRO)措施的指南:在医疗产品开发中使用以支持标签声明(以下简称最终 FDA PRO 指南)提供了一些关于 PRO 评分变化解释为治疗效果证据的建议。

方法

本文回顾了用于描述和帮助传达有意义的 PRO 变化评分阈值的方法和术语的演变。

结果

基于锚点和分布的方法发挥了重要作用,FDA 最近强调了概念的横向患者整体评估作为基于锚点的方法对反应者定义估计的重要性,反应者定义描述了个体治疗获益。最终 FDA PRO 指南提出了响应的累积分布函数(CDF)作为一种有用的方法来描绘治疗对研究人群的影响。

结论

虽然 CDF 具有重要作用,但它们不应该替代使用基于锚点的方法对 PRO 的相关反应者定义进行仔细调查,并为利益相关者提供随时间变化的解释的相关阈值。

相似文献

1
Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures.患者报告结局测量中随时间变化的解读方法。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Apr;22(3):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0175-x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
2
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
3
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods.解读患者报告的结局结果:美国 FDA 指南和新兴方法。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):163-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.12.
4
How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure.一个有充分依据的最小重要差异如何提高标签声明的透明度并改善对患者报告结局指标的解读。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-69.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments.基于锚定的方法在解释临床结局评估中重要变化时所固有的挑战。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03297-7. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
7
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
8
Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.将患者观点纳入药物研发与沟通:2001年2月16日美国食品药品监督管理局患者报告结局(PRO)协调小组会议特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;6(5):522-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x.
9
Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency.患者报告的结局:美国食品药品监督管理局指南及欧洲药品管理局反思文件的评估与当前观点
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Feb;45(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
10
Patient-reported outcomes supporting anticancer product approvals.支持抗癌产品获批的患者报告结局
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5094-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3803.

引用本文的文献

1
Internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness of the MRC Prion Disease Rating Scale.医学研究委员会朊病毒病评定量表的内部一致性、结构效度和反应性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 May 6;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00884-3.
2
Treatment of peri-implant mucositis using an Er:YAG laser or an ultrasonic device: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.使用铒激光或超声设备治疗种植体周围黏膜炎:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Jan 24;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00591-0.
3
Significant individual change should be used as a lower bound for anchor based estimates of meaningful change on patient-reported outcome scores.

本文引用的文献

1
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods.最小有意义差异(MID)点:术语和方法批判。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):171-84. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.9.
2
Assessing health-related quality of life in generalized anxiety disorder using the Quality Of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire.使用生活质量享受和满意度问卷评估广泛性焦虑障碍患者的健康相关生活质量。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Nov;24(6):289-95. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32832d6bf4.
3
Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities.
应以显著的个体变化作为基于锚定物的患者报告结局评分的有意义变化的下限估计值。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3223-3228. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03788-9. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
Establishing minimal clinically important differences for the quality of life scale QLICD-SLE for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus based on ROC curve.基于 ROC 曲线,为系统性红斑狼疮患者的生活质量量表 QLICD-SLE 确立最小临床重要差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 9;14(1):20982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71116-9.
5
Clinical meaningfulness and psychometric robustness of the MG Symptoms PRO scales in clinical trials in adults with myasthenia gravis.重症肌无力成年患者临床试验中MG症状PRO量表的临床意义及心理测量稳健性
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1368525. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1368525. eCollection 2024.
6
How to select and understand guidelines for patient-reported outcomes: a scoping review of existing guidance.如何选择和理解患者报告结局指南:现有指南的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10707-8.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of the MENQOL Instrument in Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause.绝经相关血管舒缩症状女性患者 MENQOL 量表的心理测量学评估。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2233-2252. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02787-z. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
8
Guidelines for the Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials.多发性骨髓瘤临床试验中患者报告结局的使用与报告指南。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;15(24):5764. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245764.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS SD-SF-8b instrument in individuals experiencing vasomotor symptoms due to menopause.绝经后血管舒缩症状患者 PROMIS SD-SF-8b 量表的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Nov 21;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02206-x.
10
Effect of 2-Arm Intervention on Emotional Outcomes in Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Pilot Study Trial.双臂干预对多发性硬化症患者非正式照料者情绪结局的影响:一项随机试点研究试验
Int J MS Care. 2023 Nov-Dec;25(6):252-258. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2022-111. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
反应转移:简要概述与拟议的研究重点
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9450-x. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
4
Longitudinal proxy measurements in multiple sclerosis: patient-proxy agreement on the impact of MS on daily life over a period of two years.多发性硬化症的纵向代理测量:患者与代理者关于多发性硬化症对日常生活影响的两年期一致性。
BMC Neurol. 2008 Feb 28;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-2.
5
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
6
Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective.支持医疗产品标签声明的患者报告结果:美国食品药品监督管理局的观点
Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S125-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x.
7
Interpreting and reporting results based on patient-reported outcomes.基于患者报告结局解读和报告结果。
Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S116-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00274.x.
8
Validity of patient-reported health-related quality of life global ratings of change using structural equation modeling.使用结构方程模型评估患者报告的健康相关生活质量总体变化评分的有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1193-202. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9225-1. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
9
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异:概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
10
The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients.不同形式的反应系数之间的数学关系。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):815-22. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9180-x. Epub 2007 Mar 10.