Anwander Helen, Rakhra Kawan S, Melkus Gerd, Beaulé Paul E
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1066-1075. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5011-0.
T1ρ MRI has been shown feasible to detect the biochemical status of hip cartilage, but various region-of-interest strategies have been used, compromising the reproducibility and comparability between different institutions and studies.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine representative regions of interest (ROIs) for cartilage T1ρ mapping in hips with a cam deformity; and (2) to assess intra- and interobserver reliability for cartilage T1ρ mapping in hips with a cam deformity.
The local ethics committee approved this prospective study with written informed consent obtained. Between 2010 and 2013, in 54 hips (54 patients), T1ρ 1.5-T MRI was performed. Thirty-eight hips (38 patients; 89% male) with an average age of 35 ± 7.5 years (range, 23-51 tears) were diagnosed with a cam deformity; 16 hips (16 patients; 87% male) with an average age of 34 ± 7 years (range, 23-47 years) were included in the control group. Of the 38 patients with a cam deformity, 20 were pain-free and 18 symptomatic patients underwent surgery after 6 months of failed nonsurgical management of antiinflammatories and physical therapy. Exclusion criteria were radiologic sings of osteoarthritis with Tönnis Grade 2 or higher as well as previous hip surgery. Three region-of-interest (ROI) selections were analyzed: Method 1: as a whole; Method 2: as 36 to 54 small ROIs (sections of 30° in the sagittal plane and 3 mm in the transverse plane); Method 3a: as six ROIs (sections of 90° in the sagittal plane and one-third of the acetabular depth in the transverse plane: the anterosuperior and posterosuperior quadrants, divided into lateral, intermediate, and medial thirds); and Method 3b: as the ratio (anterosuperior over posterosuperior quadrant). ROIs in Method 3 represent the region of macroscopic cartilage damage, described in intraoperative findings. To asses interobserver reliability, 10 patients were analyzed by two observers (HA, GM). For intraobserver reliability, 20 hip MRIs were analyzed twice by one observer (HA). To assess interscan reliability, three patients underwent two scans within a time period of 2 weeks and were analyzed twice by one observer (HA). T1ρ values were compared using Student's t test. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) were used to analyze intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan reliability.
Patients with a cam deformity showed increased T1ρ values in the whole hip cartilage (mean: 34.0 ± 3.8 ms versus 31.4 ± 3.0 ms; mean difference: 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-0.4; p = 0.019; Method 1), mainly anterolateral (2), in the lateral and medial thirds of the anterosuperior quadrant (mean: 32.3 ± 4.9 ms versus 29.4 ± 4.1 ms; mean difference: 3.0; 95% CI, 5.8-0.2; p = 0.039 and mean 36.5 ± 5.6 ms versus 32.6 ± 3.8 ms; mean difference: 3.8; 95% CI, 6.9-0.8; p = 0.014), and in the medial third of the posterosuperior quadrant (mean: 34.4 ± 5.5 ms versus 31.1 ± 3.9 ms; mean difference: 3.1; 95% CI, 6.2-0.1; p = 0.039) (3a). The ratio was increased in the lateral third (mean: 1.00 ± 0.12 versus 0.90 ± 0.15; mean difference: 0.10; 95% CI, 0.18-0.2; p = 0.018) (3b). ICC and RMS-CV were 0.965 and 4% (intraobserver), 0.953 and 4% (interobserver), and 0.988 (all p < 0.001) and 9% (inter-MR scan), respectively.
Cartilage T1ρ MRI mapping in hips is feasible at 1.5 T with strong inter-, intraobserver, and inter-MR scan reliability. The six ROIs (Method 3) showed a difference of T1ρ values anterolateral quadrant, consistent with the dominant area of cartilage injury in cam femoroacetabular impingement, and antero- and posteromedial, indicating involvement of the entire hip cartilage health. The six ROIs (Method 3) have been shown feasible to assess cartilage damage in hips with a cam deformity using T1ρ MRI. We suggest applying this ROI selection for further studies using quantitative MRI for assessment of cartilage damage in hips with a cam deformity to achieve better comparability and reproducibility between different studies. The application of this ROI selection on hips with other deformities (eg, pincer deformity, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and acetabular retroversion) has to be analyzed and potentially adapted.
Level III, diagnostic study.
T1ρ 磁共振成像(MRI)已被证明可用于检测髋关节软骨的生化状态,但使用了各种感兴趣区域策略,这损害了不同机构和研究之间的可重复性和可比性。
问题/目的:本研究的目的是(1)确定凸轮畸形髋关节软骨 T1ρ 映射的代表性感兴趣区域(ROI);(2)评估凸轮畸形髋关节软骨 T1ρ 映射的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
当地伦理委员会批准了这项前瞻性研究,并获得了书面知情同意书。在 2010 年至 2013 年期间,对 54 个髋关节(54 名患者)进行了 1.5-T 的 T1ρ MRI 检查。38 个髋关节(38 名患者;89%为男性)平均年龄为 35±7.5 岁(范围 23 - 51 岁)被诊断为凸轮畸形;16 个髋关节(16 名患者;87%为男性)平均年龄为 34±7 岁(范围 23 - 47 岁)被纳入对照组。在 38 名凸轮畸形患者中,20 名无疼痛,18 名有症状的患者在抗炎药和物理治疗的非手术治疗失败 6 个月后接受了手术。排除标准为 Tönnis 分级 2 级或更高的骨关节炎影像学迹象以及既往髋关节手术史。分析了三种感兴趣区域(ROI)选择:方法 1:作为一个整体;方法 2:作为 36 至 54 个小 ROI(矢状面 30°切片和横断面 3mm 切片);方法 3a:作为六个 ROI(矢状面 90°切片和横断面髋臼深度的三分之一:前上象限和后上象限,分为外侧、中间和内侧三分之一);方法 3b:作为比率(前上象限与后上象限之比)。方法 3 中的 ROI 代表术中发现的宏观软骨损伤区域。为评估观察者间可靠性,由两名观察者(HA,GM)对 10 名患者进行分析。为评估观察者内可靠性,一名观察者(HA)对 20 例髋关节 MRI 进行了两次分析。为评估扫描间可靠性,三名患者在 2 周内进行了两次扫描,并由一名观察者(HA)进行了两次分析。使用学生 t 检验比较 T1ρ 值。组内相关系数(ICC)和均方根变异系数(RMS-CV)用于分析观察者内、观察者间和扫描间可靠性。
凸轮畸形患者全髋关节软骨的 T1ρ 值升高(平均值:34.0±3.8ms 对 31.4±3.0ms;平均差异:2.5;95%置信区间[CI],4.7 - 0.4;p = 0.019;方法 1),主要在髋臼前外侧(2),在前上象限的外侧和内侧三分之一处(平均值:32.3±4.9ms 对 29.4±4.1ms;平均差异:3.0;95%CI,5.8 - 0.2;p = 0.039 和平均值 36.5±5.6ms 对 32.6±3.8ms;平均差异:3.8;95%CI,6.9 - 0.8;p = 0.014),以及在后上象限的内侧三分之一处(平均值:34.4±5.5ms 对 31.1±3.9ms;平均差异:3.1;95%CI,6.2 - 0.1;p = 0.039)(3a)。外侧三分之一处的比率升高(平均值:1.00±0.12 对 0.90±0.15;平均差异:0.10;95%CI,0.18 - 0.2;p = 0.018)(3b)。ICC 和 RMS-CV 分别为 0.965 和 4%(观察者内)、0.953 和 4%(观察者间)以及 0.988(所有 p < 0.001)和 9%(磁共振扫描间)。
1.5T 时髋关节软骨 T1ρ MRI 映射是可行的,具有很强的观察者间、观察者内和磁共振扫描间可靠性。六个 ROI(方法 3)显示髋臼前外侧象限 T1ρ 值存在差异,与凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击中软骨损伤的主要区域一致,以及髋臼前内侧和后内侧,表明整个髋关节软骨健康受到影响。已证明六个 ROI(方法 3)可通过 T1ρ MRI 评估凸轮畸形髋关节的软骨损伤。我们建议应用这种 ROI 选择,以便在进一步使用定量 MRI 评估凸轮畸形髋关节软骨损伤的研究中,实现不同研究之间更好的可比性和可重复性。这种 ROI 选择在其他畸形髋关节(如钳夹型畸形、髋关节发育不良和髋臼后倾)上的应用必须进行分析并可能进行调整。
III 级,诊断性研究。