Gocke S E, Nageotte M P, Garite T, Towers C V, Dorcester W
Valley Medical Center, Fresno, California.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;161(1):111-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90245-7.
Six hundred eighty-two consecutive twin deliveries were reviewed. Included in the study were 136 sets of vertex-nonvertex twins with birth weights greater than 1500 gm. A primary attempt at delivery of the second twin by external version was performed on 41 twins, 55 twins underwent attempted breech extraction, and 40 patients had a primary cesarean section solely because of physician preference. There were no differences in the incidence of neonatal morbidity or mortality among the modes of delivery. External version was associated with a higher failure rate than primary breech extraction (p less than 0.01). External version was associated with complications (fetal distress, cord prolapse, and compound presentation) that were not seen in the other two groups. Primary breech extraction of the second nonvertex twin weighing greater than 1500 gm appears to be a reasonable alternative to either cesarean section or external version.
对连续682例双胎分娩进行了回顾性研究。本研究纳入了136对出生体重超过1500克的头位-非头位双胎。对41例双胎进行了首次通过外倒转术娩出第二胎儿的尝试,55例双胎尝试臀位牵引术,40例患者仅因医生偏好而进行了首次剖宫产。不同分娩方式的新生儿发病率或死亡率无差异。外倒转术的失败率高于首次臀位牵引术(p<0.01)。外倒转术与其他两组未见的并发症(胎儿窘迫、脐带脱垂和复合先露)相关。对于体重超过1500克的第二非头位双胎,首次臀位牵引术似乎是剖宫产或外倒转术的合理替代方法。