Dymon Miłosz, Ciebiera Michał, Zgliczyńska Magdalena, Siergiej Małgorzata, Kociuba Jakub, Szajnik Marta
Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.
Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):584-590. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15006. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
One of the key challenges regarding the management of twins involves choosing the optimal mode of delivery, which is strongly influenced by the final presentation of both fetuses. In cases of vertex-nonvertex pregnancies attempting the trial of vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) is one of possible management options. The main objective of this review was to collect and summarize available data in terms of the application of ECV in the population of nonvertex second twins.
Using the PRISMA guidelines, we searched for original, English-language studies investigating ECV in nonvertex second twins. The PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and COCHRANE databases were searched until May 2024. Reviews, case reports, editorials, and conference papers were excluded from further analysis. Out of 260 papers retrieved, 10 were subjected to the final analysis in terms of success rates, modes of delivery, and adverse outcomes.
The total number of ECVs was 289, with an overall success rate of 64.4%. In the group of successful versions, vertex vaginal delivery was achieved in 171 cases (91.9%). The incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes was low.
The purpose of this review was to consolidate and update the current knowledge regarding ECV in nonvertex second twins. Based on the results of this series of studies, ECV appears to be a reasonable management option. However, it is important to highlight several significant limitations. The primary concern is the lack of recent research in this field over the past three decades, with the most recent study in our review being published in 1998. Furthermore, the actual number of studies addressing this topic is relatively low, characterized by a retrospective nature and questionable methodologies. These limitations make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions for clinical practice. This is an important message for our community, emphasizing the need for further studies in this area, particularly randomized controlled trials, to evaluate the safety and success rate of vaginal twin delivery after ECV when the second twin presents in a nonvertex position.
双胎管理的关键挑战之一是选择最佳分娩方式,这在很大程度上受两个胎儿最终胎位的影响。在头先露-非头先露妊娠且尝试经阴道分娩的情况下,外倒转术(ECV)是一种可能的管理选择。本综述的主要目的是收集和总结关于ECV在非头先露的第二个双胎人群中应用的现有数据。
我们使用PRISMA指南,检索了关于非头先露的第二个双胎中ECV的英文原创研究。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、SCOPUS和Cochrane数据库直至2024年5月。综述、病例报告、社论和会议论文被排除在进一步分析之外。在检索到的260篇论文中,10篇就成功率、分娩方式和不良结局进行了最终分析。
ECV总数为289例,总体成功率为64.4%。在成功倒转的组中,171例(91.9%)实现了头先露经阴道分娩。母婴不良结局的发生率较低。
本综述的目的是巩固和更新关于非头先露的第二个双胎中ECV的现有知识。基于这一系列研究的结果,ECV似乎是一种合理的管理选择。然而,重要的是要强调几个重大局限性。主要问题是在过去三十年中该领域缺乏近期研究,我们综述中最近的研究发表于1998年。此外,涉及该主题的实际研究数量相对较少,具有回顾性性质且方法存在疑问。这些局限性使得难以得出临床实践的确切结论。这对我们这个群体来说是一个重要信息,强调了在该领域进行进一步研究的必要性,特别是随机对照试验,以评估当第二个双胎为非头先露胎位时ECV后经阴道双胎分娩的安全性和成功率。