Chauhan S P, Roberts W E, McLaren R A, Roach H, Morrison J C, Martin J N
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;173(4):1015-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91319-x.
Our purpose was to compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin gestations in which the nonvertex second twin was delivered by total breech extraction versus those delivered by external cephalic version.
The intrapartum courses of 284 consecutive twin gestations were analyzed retrospectively. Once those with actual birth weight < 600 gm, unrecognized multifetal pregnancy, multiple congenital anomalies, cesarean delivery, and/or antepartum intrauterine fetal death were excluded, 23 mothers were delivered by total breech extraction and 21 underwent external cephalic version.
The two groups were similar for mean (+/- SD) maternal age, gravidity, parity, gestational age at delivery, ultrasonographic estimate of birth weight for twin B, incidence of breech or transverse presentation for the second fetus, and actual birth weight of the first or second newborn. Suspected fetal distress that led to cesarean delivery occurred significantly more often in parturients who underwent attempted external version (4/21) than total breech extraction (0/23, p = 0.04). The incidence of eventual abdominal delivery was also significantly higher in patients who underwent attempted external cephalic version (10/21) rather than breech extraction (1/23, p = 0.001). For twin B the occurrence of low Apgar scores at 1 minute was significantly higher for infants after attempted external version (7/21) rather than breech extraction (1/23, p = 0.02), but the mean pH, number with Apgar scores < 7 at 5 minutes, and number of neonatal intensive care unit admissions were similar. No perinatal traumatic injury occurred in either group.
On the basis of our experience, total breech extraction of the nonvertex second twin is preferable to external cephalic version because it appears to be associated with a significantly lower incidence of fetal distress and abdominal delivery with comparable neonatal outcome.
我们的目的是比较非头位第二胎儿通过完全臀牵引娩出与通过外倒转术娩出的双胎妊娠的母儿结局。
对连续284例双胎妊娠的产程进行回顾性分析。排除实际出生体重<600克、未识别的多胎妊娠、多发先天性畸形、剖宫产和/或产前宫内胎儿死亡的病例后,23例母亲的第二胎儿通过完全臀牵引娩出,21例接受了外倒转术。
两组在平均(±标准差)母亲年龄、孕周、产次、分娩时的孕周、超声估计的B胎儿出生体重、第二胎儿臀位或横位的发生率以及第一或第二新生儿的实际出生体重方面相似。导致剖宫产的可疑胎儿窘迫在尝试外倒转术的产妇中(4/21)比完全臀牵引娩出的产妇中(0/23)更频繁发生(p = 0.04)。尝试外倒转术的患者最终经腹分娩的发生率(10/21)也显著高于臀牵引娩出的患者(1/23,p = 0.001)。对于B胎儿,尝试外倒转术后1分钟时低Apgar评分的发生率在婴儿中(7/21)显著高于臀牵引娩出的婴儿(1/23,p = 0.02),但平均pH值、5分钟时Apgar评分<7的数量以及新生儿重症监护病房收治数量相似。两组均未发生围产期创伤性损伤。
根据我们的经验,非头位第二胎儿的完全臀牵引娩出优于外倒转术,因为它似乎与胎儿窘迫和经腹分娩的发生率显著降低相关,且新生儿结局相当。