• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(Elape):一项回顾性队列研究。

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Hanif Zulfiqar, Bradley Alison, Hammad Ahmed, Mukherjee Arijit

机构信息

NHS, Department of Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, NHS Trust, Eaglesham Road, G75 8RG, Glasgow, UK.

West of Scotland Surgical Association, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Jul 20;10:32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.016. eCollection 2016 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.016
PMID:27508080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4971229/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers. It is a more radical approach than conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) with potentially better oncological outcome. The aim of this study was to analyse short term results of ELAPE compared with conventional abdominoperineal excision.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively for 72 patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal carcinomas from 2010 to 2014. Of these 24 patients underwent ELAPE with biological prosthetic mesh used to close the perineal defect.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 68 (37-87). Positive circumferential resection margin (1/24 vs. 8/48) and Intra operative perorations (0/24 vs. 6/48) compared favourably with ELAPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Short term results from this study support that ELAPE has better oncological outcome.

摘要

引言

经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)是一种针对低位直肠癌的相对较新的手术技术。它是一种比传统腹会阴联合切除术(APE)更为根治性的方法,可能具有更好的肿瘤学结局。本研究的目的是分析ELAPE与传统腹会阴联合切除术相比的短期结果。

方法

前瞻性收集了2010年至2014年期间因低位直肠癌接受腹会阴联合切除术(APE)的72例患者的数据。其中24例患者接受了ELAPE,并使用生物人工补片来封闭会阴缺损。

结果

患者的中位年龄为68岁(37 - 87岁)。与ELAPE相比,环周切缘阳性率(1/24对8/48)和术中穿孔率(0/24对6/48)更有利。

结论

本研究的短期结果支持ELAPE具有更好的肿瘤学结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/62e6bde312b5/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/3b77ed472436/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/8dc25e59b1ce/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/aa6d6f7fc1b9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/62e6bde312b5/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/3b77ed472436/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/8dc25e59b1ce/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/aa6d6f7fc1b9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f75a/4971229/62e6bde312b5/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study.经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(Elape):一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Jul 20;10:32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.016. eCollection 2016 Sep.
2
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术与传统手术治疗低位直肠癌:单术者经验
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Dec 1;32(4):244-247. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3251. eCollection 2016.
3
Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术术后会阴伤口并发症:一家区域癌症中心的经验
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;9(2):211-214. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0741-y. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
4
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.直肠癌的经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)——来自瑞典结直肠癌登记处的短期结果。有必要选择性地使用ELAPE。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;29(8):981-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1932-9. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Trans-perineal minimally invasive approach during extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.经会阴入路微创技术在超低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Aug;43(8):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.11.004. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) is Not Superior to Abdominoperineal Excision (APE) in the Era of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.超低位直肠前切除术(ELAPE)在新辅助治疗时代并不优于经腹会阴联合切除术(APE)。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2022 Dec 4;43(3):21-27. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2022-0033. Print 2022 Nov 1.
7
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach.下直肠肿瘤切除术后采用简化臀下动脉穿支(IGAP)筋膜皮瓣修复会阴缺损的可行性:多学科方法的发生率及结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;15(13):3345. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133345.
8
A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.经肛门直肠低位前切除术(ELAPE)与传统腹腔镜和开腹经肛门直肠低位前切除术的前瞻性病例对照研究:短期结果和生活质量的比较分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;16(5):355-62. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0851-4. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
9
Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.臀旁会阴联合切除术与标准经腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的回顾性研究:一项长期随访研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2977-y. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.经括约肌间切除与腹会阴联合切除治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Oct 20;132(20):2446-2456. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000485.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative pressure wound management in perineal wound status post abdominoperineal resection and extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹会阴联合切除术后及肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术后会阴伤口负压伤口处理:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 18;38(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04353-5.
2
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision in distal rectal cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study.腹腔镜超低位直肠前切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的回顾性对比研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 8;22(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01865-9.
3
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察研究报告的强化(STROBE)声明:观察研究报告指南》。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
2
A pictorial description of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.经肛会阴联合切除低位直肠癌的图示描述。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):e655-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03181.x.
3
A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
经括约肌间切除与腹会阴联合切除治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Oct 20;132(20):2446-2456. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000485.
4
Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术术后会阴伤口并发症:一家区域癌症中心的经验
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;9(2):211-214. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0741-y. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
5
Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal excision and oncologic outcomes for patients with distal rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.标准与经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的疗效及肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9150. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009150.
标准经腹会阴切除与“圆柱状”经腹会阴切除治疗低位直肠癌的切缘累及率和术中穿孔率的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;15(1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03167.x.
4
Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.腹会阴联合切除术后肛门外括约肌保留与标准手术的结果比较:单中心研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02930.x.
5
Prone or lithotomy positioning during an abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer results in comparable oncologic outcomes.直肠癌腹会阴切除术采用俯卧或截石位,其肿瘤学结果相当。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Aug;54(8):939-46. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318221eb64.
6
Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.直肠癌经腹会阴联合切除术与标准经腹会阴联合切除术的比较——系统综述。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;26(10):1227-40. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1235-3. Epub 2011 May 21.
7
Extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: new direction or miles behind?低位直肠癌的经提肌腹会阴联合切除术:新方向还是落后甚远?
Arch Surg. 2010 Sep;145(9):811-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.174.
8
Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.柱状腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学优势证据。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3517-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
9
Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.扩大经腹会阴切除术联合臀大肌皮瓣重建盆底治疗直肠癌
Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):232-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5489.
10
Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection.低位直肠癌:呼吁改变腹会阴联合切除术的手术方式
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9257-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9231.