Yildirim Selda, Gurel Mehmet Salih, Gungor Sule, Tekeli Omur, Canat Dilek
Dermatology Department, Atakent Acibadem Hospital, Acibadem Unıversity, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dermatology Department, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Jun;33(3):199-205. doi: 10.5114/ada.2016.60612. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
Skin aging is a problem which negatively affects the psyche of the person, social relations, as well as work life and health and which compels the patients to find appropriate treatment methods. Numerous treatment methods have been developed in order to delay aging and to reduce the aging effects in addition to having a younger, healthier and more beautiful facial appearance.
To compare the efficiency, cosmetic results and possible adverse effects of the peeling treatment with 25% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 0.1% retinoic acid for facial rejuvenation in patients presenting with skin aging.
Fifty female patients in total presenting with medium and advanced degree skin aging were subject to this study. Two separate treatment groups were formed; the first group underwent chemical skin treatment with 25% TCA while the other group was applied with 0.1% retinoic acid treatment. Following the 4 months' treatment the patients were controlled three times in total for post lesional hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scars, skin irritation and other possible changes per month. The pretreatment and first follow-up visit, and final control images were comparatively evaluated by three observers via specific software.
The healing rates of the group subject to retinoic acid were statistically higher (p < 0.05) compared to patients in the TCA group in the final follow-up visit following the treatment according to the first and second observers. On the other hand, according to the third observer, patients applied with retinoic acid presented with higher healing rates compared to those treated with TCA, however; this rate was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The frequency of TCA- and retinoic acid-associated adverse effects was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). As a result of both treatments, a reduction in the quality of life scores as well as a pronounced recovery (p = 0.001) in the quality of life of those patients with skin aging was observed.
The photo aging treatment option with 0.1% retinoic acid is cheaper and more feasible for patients compared to 25% TCA, and it is also as reliable and effective as TCA.
皮肤老化是一个对人的心理、社会关系以及工作生活和健康都产生负面影响的问题,它迫使患者寻找合适的治疗方法。为了延缓衰老、减少衰老影响,除了拥有更年轻、健康和美丽的面容外,人们已经开发出了许多治疗方法。
比较25%三氯乙酸(TCA)和0.1%维甲酸剥脱治疗对皮肤老化患者面部年轻化的疗效、美容效果及可能的不良反应。
本研究共纳入50例中度和重度皮肤老化的女性患者。形成两个独立的治疗组;第一组接受25% TCA化学皮肤治疗,而另一组接受0.1%维甲酸治疗。治疗4个月后,每月对患者进行3次检查,观察皮损后色素减退、色素沉着、瘢痕、皮肤刺激及其他可能的变化。三位观察者通过特定软件对治疗前、首次随访和最终对照图像进行比较评估。
根据第一和第二位观察者的观察,在治疗后的最终随访中,维甲酸组的愈合率在统计学上高于TCA组患者(p < 0.05)。另一方面,根据第三位观察者的观察,使用维甲酸的患者愈合率高于使用TCA的患者,然而,该率无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。两组中TCA和维甲酸相关不良反应的发生率相似(p > 0.05)。两种治疗均使皮肤老化患者的生活质量评分降低,生活质量有显著改善(p = 0.001)。
与25% TCA相比,0.1%维甲酸光老化治疗方案对患者来说更便宜且更可行,并且它与TCA一样可靠有效。