Suppr超能文献

用于诱捕库蠓、蚊子及其他双翅目昆虫的不同光源比较

Comparison of different light sources for trapping Culicoides biting midges, mosquitoes and other dipterans.

作者信息

González Mikel, Alarcón-Elbal Pedro María, Valle-Mora Javier, Goldarazena Arturo

机构信息

Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.

Universidad Agroforestal Fernando Arturo de Meriño, Jarabacoa 41000, Dominican Republic.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2016 Aug 15;226:44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

Abstract

The response of Culicoides biting midges, mosquitoes and other dipterans to different wavelengths was evaluated in a farm meadow in northern Spain. A total of 9449 specimens of 23 species of Culicoides, 5495 other ceratopogonids (non-biting midges), 602 culicids and 12428 other mixed dipterans were captured. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suction light traps fitted with five light emitting diodes (LEDs) (white, green, red, blue, ultraviolet) were run for 15 consecutive nights. Significantly more Culicoides were collected in those traps fitted with green, blue or ultraviolet (UV) lights than in red and white-baited LED traps for the most abundant species captured: C. punctatus (37.5%), C. cataneii (26.5%) and C. obsoletus/C. scoticus (20.4%). Similar results were obtained for non-Culicoides ceratopogonids, mosquitoes and other mixed dipterans. Wavelengths in green (570nm) resulted effective for targeting some Culicoides species, culicids and other midges. In a second trial, the effectiveness of 4-W white and UV tubes was compared to traps fitted with UV LED and a standard incandescent light bulb. More specimens of all taxa were collected with fluorescent black light (UV) traps than with the other light sources, except culicids, which were recovered in high numbers from fluorescent white light traps.

摘要

在西班牙北部的一个农场草地上,评估了蠓、蚊子和其他双翅目昆虫对不同波长的反应。共捕获了23种蠓的9449个标本、5495只其他蠓科昆虫(非吸血蠓)、602只蚊科昆虫和12428只其他双翅目混合昆虫。装有五个发光二极管(LED)(白色、绿色、红色、蓝色、紫外线)的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)吸光诱捕器连续运行了15个晚上。对于捕获量最多的物种:斑点库蠓(37.5%)、卡氏库蠓(26.5%)和废弃库蠓/苏格兰库蠓(20.4%),装有绿色、蓝色或紫外线(UV)灯的诱捕器收集到的蠓明显多于装有红色和白色诱饵LED诱捕器。对于非蠓科蠓、蚊子和其他双翅目混合昆虫也获得了类似结果。绿色(570nm)波长对于针对某些蠓物种、蚊科昆虫和其他蠓类有效。在第二项试验中,将4瓦白色和紫外线灯管的有效性与装有紫外线LED和标准白炽灯泡的诱捕器进行了比较。除了蚊科昆虫,荧光黑光(紫外线)诱捕器收集到的所有分类群的标本都比其他光源多,蚊科昆虫在荧光白光诱捕器中大量捕获。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验