Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Herzzentrum Luwidshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 16;68(7):715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.053.
Bioabsorbable cardiac matrix (BCM) is a novel device that attenuates adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after large myocardial infarctions in experimental models.
This study aimed to analyze whether BCM, compared with saline control, would result in less LV dilation and fewer adverse clinical events between baseline and 6 months.
In an international, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 303 subjects with large areas of infarction despite successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were randomized 2:1 to BCM or saline injected into the infarct-related artery 2 to 5 days after primary PCI. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, 6-minute walk time, and New York Heart Association functional class at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, target-vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, significant arrhythmia requiring therapy, or myocardial rupture through 6 months.
In total, 201 subjects were assigned to BCM and 102 to saline control. There was no significant difference in change in LVEDVI from baseline to 6 months between the groups (mean change ± SD: BCM 14.1 ± 28.9 ml/m(2) vs. saline 11.7 ± 26.9 ml/m(2); p = 0.49). There was also no significant difference in the secondary endpoints. The rates of the primary safety outcome were similar between the 2 groups (BCM 11.6% vs. saline 9.1%; p = 0.37).
Intracoronary deployment of BCM 2 to 5 days after successful reperfusion in subjects with large myocardial infarction did not reduce adverse LV remodeling or cardiac clinical events at 6 months. (IK-5001 for the Prevention of Remodeling of the Ventricle and Congestive Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction [PRESERVATION I]; NCT01226563).
生物可吸收性心脏基质(BCM)是一种新型装置,可在实验模型中减轻大面积心肌梗死(MI)后左心室(LV)重构的不良影响。
本研究旨在分析与盐水对照相比,BCM 是否会导致 LV 扩张减少和 6 个月时的不良临床事件减少。
在一项国际性、随机、双盲、对照试验中,303 例接受 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)成功后仍有大面积梗死的患者,按 2:1 比例随机分为 BCM 组或盐水对照组,在 PCI 后 2-5 天将 BCM 或盐水注入梗死相关动脉。主要终点是 6 个月时 LV 舒张末期容积指数(LVEDVI)的基线变化平均值。次要终点包括 6 分钟步行距离、堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评分和 6 个月时纽约心脏协会功能分级的变化。主要安全性终点是 6 个月时心血管死亡、再发心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建、支架血栓形成、需要治疗的严重心律失常或心肌破裂的复合终点。
共有 201 例患者被分配到 BCM 组,102 例患者被分配到盐水对照组。两组之间从基线到 6 个月时 LVEDVI 的变化无显著差异(平均变化±SD:BCM 组为 14.1±28.9ml/m2,盐水对照组为 11.7±26.9ml/m2;p=0.49)。次要终点也无显著差异。两组的主要安全性结局发生率相似(BCM 组为 11.6%,盐水对照组为 9.1%;p=0.37)。
在大面积心肌梗死患者成功再灌注后 2-5 天,经冠状动脉内给予 BCM 并未减少 6 个月时 LV 重构或心脏临床事件的发生。(IK-5001 用于预防急性心肌梗死后心室重构和充血性心力衰竭[PRESERVATION I];NCT01226563)。