• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

65岁及以下患者的初次反肩关节置换术。

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger.

作者信息

Samuelsen Brian T, Wagner Eric R, Houdek Matthew T, Elhassan Bassem T, Sánchez-Sotelo Joaquín, Cofield Robert, Sperling John W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):e13-e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.026
PMID:27522342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has classically been reserved for patients older than 65 years with rotator cuff arthropathy, pseudoparalysis, and severe pain. This investigation assessed outcomes in a consecutive series of patients aged 65 and younger undergoing primary RTSA.

METHODS

There were 63 patients (67 shoulders; 40 women, 27 men) with a mean age of 60 years (range, 50-65 years). Indications were cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) in 51, severe glenohumeral arthritis in 15, and osteonecrosis in 1. The primary end point was revision-free implant survival. Pain scale, motion, strength, and radiographic outcomes were also studied.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years), the 2-year and 5-year revision-free survival was 99% and 91%, and reoperation-free survival was 97% and 90%, respectively. Complications occurred in 9%. Smoking increased the risk for revision, reoperation, and complications (P < .03). Patients experienced improvements in pain (P < .0001), active abduction (57.5° vs. 132.4°, P < .0001), and active external rotation (20.1° vs. 39.4°, P < .001). At the most recent follow-up, 90% patients were satisfied with their result, and 85% felt they were better or much better than before surgery. There was an 18% incidence notching, 3% incidence of dislocation, and no loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

At both 2 and 5 years, RTSA is a reliable operation in patients aged younger than 65 years. Patients gain significant improvements in pain level, range of motion, and strength, without a large number of early failures. Long-term follow-up is needed to understand late component mechanical problems and loosening.

摘要

背景

传统上,反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)仅适用于年龄超过65岁、患有肩袖关节病、假性麻痹和严重疼痛的患者。本研究评估了连续一系列65岁及以下接受初次RTSA患者的手术效果。

方法

共有63例患者(67个肩关节;40名女性,27名男性),平均年龄60岁(范围50 - 65岁)。手术指征包括51例肩袖撕裂关节病(CTA)、15例严重的盂肱关节炎和1例骨坏死。主要终点是无翻修的植入物生存率。还研究了疼痛量表、活动度、力量和影像学结果。

结果

平均随访3年(范围2 - 8年),2年和5年无翻修生存率分别为99%和91%,无再次手术生存率分别为97%和90%。并发症发生率为9%。吸烟增加了翻修、再次手术和并发症的风险(P < 0.03)。患者的疼痛(P < 0.0001)、主动外展(57.5°对132.4°,P < 0.0001)和主动外旋(20.1°对39.4°,P < 0.001)均有改善。在最近一次随访时,90%的患者对结果满意,85%的患者感觉比手术前更好或好多了。有18%的发生率出现骨切迹,3%的发生率出现脱位,无松动情况。

结论

在2年和5年时,RTSA对于65岁以下患者是一种可靠的手术。患者在疼痛程度、活动范围和力量方面有显著改善,且早期失败情况较少。需要长期随访以了解后期假体的机械问题和松动情况。

相似文献

1
Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger.65岁及以下患者的初次反肩关节置换术。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):e13-e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
2
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study.采用无柄非骨水泥型短干骺端肱骨假体的反肩关节置换术:一项前瞻性2至7年随访研究的临床和影像学结果
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):1362-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
3
Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years.60 岁以下患者行反式全肩关节置换术的临床疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
4
Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后的结果:反向与解剖型全肩关节置换术的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-up.非骨水泥型反式全肩关节置换术的临床和影像学结果:2 至 5 年随访的对比研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.032. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
6
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty without Bone-Grafting for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Intact Rotator Cuff.不植骨的反向全肩关节置换术治疗骨关节炎且肩袖完整患者的严重肩胛盂骨缺损
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1801-1807. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01181.
7
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Salvage Procedure for Failed Prior Arthroplasty.反式全肩关节置换术:既往关节置换失败后的挽救手术。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Jun;9(2):200-206. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.200. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen years.65 岁以下巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂患者行反向全肩关节置换术:5 至 15 年后的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.016. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with os acromiale.肩峰下骨切除术患者的反式肩关节置换术。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Sep;26(9):1598-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis.反式肩关节置换术治疗无肩关节炎的不可修复性肩袖撕裂。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00912.

引用本文的文献

1
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in elderly patients.老年患者全肩关节置换翻修术的疗效
JSES Int. 2025 Feb 6;9(3):815-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.01.006. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Which patient level factors predict persistent pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?哪些患者因素可预测反式全肩关节置换术后持续性疼痛?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 22;19(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05285-8.
3
The surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures 2010-2019: United States national case volume and incidence trends.
2010 - 2019年肱骨近端骨折的外科治疗:美国全国病例数量及发病率趋势
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Mar 31;4(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.02.009. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Inlay and Onlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Neer Type 4 Proximal Humerus Fractures and Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Multicentric Study.Neer 4型肱骨近端骨折和肩袖撕裂性关节病中嵌体式与覆盖式反肩关节置换术的功能结果及并发症比较:一项多中心研究
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Jan 23;58(3):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01084-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Trends in the surgical management of proximal humerus fractures in Ireland from 2009 to 2022: An increasing usage of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.2009年至2022年爱尔兰近端肱骨骨折手术治疗趋势:反肩关节置换术的使用增加。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):1855-1861. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03625-5. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old Exhibit Lower Clinically Significant Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores Compared to Older Patients.与老年患者相比,60岁以下的反肩关节置换术患者在具有临床意义的单项评估数值评定(SANE)评分方面较低。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46492. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Smoking cessation prior to total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review of outcomes and complications.全肩关节置换术前戒烟:结局与并发症的系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Oct;15(5):484-496. doi: 10.1177/17585732221131916. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
Shoulder joint arthroplasty in young patients: Analysis of 8742 patients from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.年轻患者的肩关节置换术:来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的8742例患者分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Sep;15(1 Suppl):41-52. doi: 10.1177/17585732211058717. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
Preoperative Planning for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does the Clinical Range of Motion Match the Planned 3D Humeral Displacement?反肩关节置换术的术前规划:临床活动范围与计划的三维肱骨移位是否匹配?
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 29;13(5):771. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050771.
10
Clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 60 years old and younger; medium-term results.60岁及以下患者行反肩关节置换术后的临床结果;中期结果。
JSES Int. 2023 Jan 13;7(2):277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.018. eCollection 2023 Mar.