McBride Andrew Phillip, Ross Mark, Duke Phil, Hoy Greg, Page Richard, Dyer Chelsea, Taylor Fraser
Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Brisbane Hand and Upper limb Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Sep;15(1 Suppl):41-52. doi: 10.1177/17585732211058717. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Shoulder replacement is a reliable treatment for the relief of pain and improvement of function in patients with glenohumeral arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, osteonecrosis and fracture. Limited data is available comparing revision rates for the different types of shoulder replacement when used in younger patients. This study aims to compare the survivorship of hemi resurfacing, stemmed hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in younger patients using data from a large national arthroplasty registry.
Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry was obtained for the period 16 April 2004-31 December 2018. The study population included all shoulder arthroplasty patients aged <65 years. These were stratified into two groups: <55 years and 55-64 years. A total of 8742 primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures were analysed (1936 procedures in the <55 years and 6806 in the 55-64 years age group).
In the <55 years age group, there was no difference in revision rate for total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at any time point. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had a lower revision rate after six months when compared to hemi resurfacing (HRA) (p = 0.031). Also, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had a higher early rate of revision in the first 12 months compared to hemiarthroplasty (p = 0.018). However, from 2 years reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had a lower revision rate overall (p = 0.029).In the 55-64 years patient age group, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had a lower earlier revision rate. This was statistically significant compared to hemi resurfacing (HRA) (p = 0.028), hemiarthroplasty (p = 0.049) and total shoulder arthroplasty (p < 0.001).
This study demonstrated that for patients aged <55 years there was no significant difference in the rate of revision when total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were compared. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had a lower rate of revision when compared to hemi resurfacing and hemiarthroplasty after 2 years. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had the lowest comparative revision rate in patients aged 55-64 years overall.
肩关节置换术是缓解盂肱关节炎、肩袖关节病、骨坏死和骨折患者疼痛并改善其功能的可靠治疗方法。关于不同类型肩关节置换术应用于年轻患者时的翻修率对比数据有限。本研究旨在利用来自一个大型全国关节置换登记处的数据,比较半关节表面置换术、带柄半肩关节置换术、全肩关节置换术和反式全肩关节置换术在年轻患者中的生存率。
获取澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处2004年4月16日至2018年12月31日期间的数据。研究人群包括所有年龄<65岁的肩关节置换术患者。这些患者被分为两组:<55岁组和55 - 64岁组。共分析了8742例初次肩关节置换手术(<55岁组1936例,55 - 64岁年龄组680例)。
在<55岁年龄组中,全肩关节置换术与反式全肩关节置换术在任何时间点的翻修率均无差异。与半关节表面置换术(HRA)相比,反式全肩关节置换术在6个月后的翻修率更低(p = <55岁组和55 - 64岁组。共分析了8742例初次肩关节置换手术(<55岁组1936例,55 - 64岁年龄组6806例)。
在<55岁年龄组中,全肩关节置换术与反式全肩关节置换术在任何时间点的翻修率均无差异。与半关节表面置换术(HRA)相比,反式全肩关节置换术在6个月后的翻修率更低(p = 0.03<55岁组和55 - 64岁组。共分析了8742例初次肩关节置换手术(<55岁组1936例,55 - 64岁年龄组6806例)。
在<55岁年龄组中,全肩关节置换术与反式全肩关节置换术在任何时间点的翻修率均无差异。与半关节表面置换术(HRA)相比,反式全肩关节置换术在6个月后的翻修率更低(p = 0.031)。此外,与半肩关节置换术相比,反式全肩关节置换术在最初12个月内早期翻修率更高(p = 0.018)。然而,从2年起反式全肩关节置换术总体翻修率更低(p = 0.029)。在55 - 64岁患者年龄组中,反式全肩关节置换术早期翻修率更低。与半关节表面置换术(HRA)(p = 0.028)、半肩关节置换术(p = 0.049)和全肩关节置换术(p<0.001)相比,这具有统计学意义。
本研究表明,对于<55岁的患者,比较全肩关节置换术和反式全肩关节置换术时翻修率无显著差异。与半关节表面置换术和半肩关节置换术相比,反式全肩关节置换术在2年后翻修率更低。总体而言,反式全肩关节置换术在55 - 64岁患者中的相对翻修率最低。