Suppr超能文献

用于生物医学应用的eri蚕丝素蛋白支架与柞蚕丝素蛋白支架的比较。

Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications.

作者信息

Andiappan Muthumanickkam, Kumari Tinesh, Sundaramoorthy Subramanian, Meiyazhagan Gowri, Manoharan Prasath, Venkataraman Ganesh

机构信息

Department of Textile Technology, Anna University, Chennai, India.

Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Prog Biomater. 2016;5:81-91. doi: 10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Abstract

The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this work, comparison was made between eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical application. The scaffolds were produced from eri silk fibroin (ESF) and tasar silk fibroin (TSF) by electrospinning method and they were treated with ethanol to improve dimensional stability. Ethanol treatment increased the crystallinity% of both ESF and TSF scaffolds. The crystallinity percentage of the ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 46.7 and 42.8 % respectively. Thermal stability was higher for ESF than that of TSF scaffold. The hemolytic % of ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 1.3 and 7.7 % respectively. The platelet adhesion on the surface of ESF scaffold was lower than that found on TSF scaffold. Better fibroblast cell attachment, binding and spreading was found on the ESF scaffold. The cell viability on ESF scaffold was 83.78 % and in TSF was 78.01 % for 48 h. The results showed that ESF electrospun scaffold can be considered as a better biomaterial for biomedical applications compared to that of TSF scaffold.

摘要

人工养殖的桑蚕丝正以不同形式被用作生物材料。蓖麻蚕、柞蚕和木薯蚕是一些已知的野生丝品种。尽管对蓖麻蚕丝有一些研究,但关于由这些野生丝制成的电纺垫在生物医学应用方面的研究仍然有限。在这项工作中,对用于生物医学应用的蓖麻蚕丝和柞蚕丝纤维支架进行了比较。通过电纺丝法由蓖麻蚕丝纤维(ESF)和柞蚕丝纤维(TSF)制备支架,并对它们进行乙醇处理以提高尺寸稳定性。乙醇处理提高了ESF和TSF支架的结晶度百分比。ESF和TSF支架的结晶度百分比分别为46.7%和42.8%。ESF的热稳定性高于TSF支架。ESF和TSF支架的溶血率分别为1.3%和7.7%。ESF支架表面的血小板粘附低于TSF支架。在ESF支架上发现了更好的成纤维细胞附着、结合和铺展。48小时后,ESF支架上的细胞活力为83.78%,TSF支架上为78.01%。结果表明,与TSF支架相比,ESF电纺支架可被认为是一种更适合生物医学应用的生物材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e43e/5151792/a7946eecef33/40204_2016_47_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验