• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食失调寻求帮助的感知障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。

Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help-seeking for eating disorders: A systematic review.

作者信息

Ali Kathina, Farrer Louise, Fassnacht Daniel B, Gulliver Amelia, Bauer Stephanie, Griffiths Kathleen M

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health Research, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Research School of Psychology, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Jan;50(1):9-21. doi: 10.1002/eat.22598. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1002/eat.22598
PMID:27526643
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on perceived barriers and facilitators of help-seeking for eating disorders.

METHOD

Three databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane) were searched using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Retrieved abstracts (N = 3493) were double screened and relevant papers (n = 13) were double coded. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included if they reported perceived barriers and facilitators towards seeking help for eating disorders. Barriers and facilitators were extracted from the included papers and coded under themes. The most prominent barriers and facilitators were determined by the number of studies reporting each theme.

RESULTS

Eight qualitative, three quantitative, and two mixed-methods studies met the inclusion criteria for the current review. The most prominent perceived barriers to help-seeking were stigma and shame, denial of and failure to perceive the severity of the illness, practical barriers (e.g., cost of treatment), low motivation to change, negative attitudes towards seeking help, lack of encouragement from others to seek help and lack of knowledge about help resources. Facilitators of help-seeking were reported in six studies, with the most prominent themes identified as the presence of other mental health problems or emotional distress, and concerns about health.

DISCUSSION

Programs targeting prevention and early intervention for eating disorders should focus on reducing stigma and shame, educating individuals about the severity of eating disorders, and increasing knowledge around help-seeking pathways for eating disorders. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:9-21).

摘要

目的

系统回顾关于饮食失调求助过程中感知到的障碍和促进因素的文献。

方法

使用关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)在三个数据库(PubMed、PsychInfo、Cochrane)中进行检索。对检索到的摘要(N = 3493)进行两轮筛选,对相关论文(n = 13)进行两轮编码。纳入报告饮食失调求助过程中感知到的障碍和促进因素的定性和定量研究。从纳入的论文中提取障碍和促进因素,并按主题进行编码。根据报告每个主题的研究数量确定最突出的障碍和促进因素。

结果

八项定性研究、三项定量研究和两项混合方法研究符合本次综述的纳入标准。求助过程中最突出的感知障碍是耻辱感和羞耻感、否认并未能认识到疾病的严重性、实际障碍(如治疗费用)、改变的动力低、对寻求帮助持消极态度、缺乏他人鼓励寻求帮助以及对求助资源缺乏了解。六项研究报告了求助的促进因素,最突出的主题是存在其他心理健康问题或情绪困扰以及对健康的担忧。

讨论

针对饮食失调预防和早期干预的项目应侧重于减少耻辱感和羞耻感,教育个人了解饮食失调的严重性,并增加关于饮食失调求助途径的知识。© 2016威利期刊公司(《国际进食障碍杂志》2017年;50:9 - 21)

相似文献

1
Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help-seeking for eating disorders: A systematic review.饮食失调寻求帮助的感知障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Jan;50(1):9-21. doi: 10.1002/eat.22598. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
2
Interventions for preventing eating disorders in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年饮食失调的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(2):CD002891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002891.
3
Pathways to improve early intervention for eating disorders: Findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善饮食失调早期干预的途径:系统评价与荟萃分析的结果
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Feb;56(2):314-330. doi: 10.1002/eat.23845. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
4
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
5
Stigma-related barriers and facilitators to help seeking for mental health issues in the armed forces: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature.与耻辱感相关的阻碍和促进因素会影响军人寻求心理健康问题的帮助:定性文献的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1880-1892. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000356. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Interventions to reduce the stigma of eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以减少进食障碍污名:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Mar;50(3):210-230. doi: 10.1002/eat.22691. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Observing the Influence of Shame and Guilt in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.观察羞耻和内疚对炎症性肠病的影响:一项系统综述。
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Jun;22(3):185-195. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250302.
2
Acceptability of a personalised single-session feedback intervention for eating disorders: a qualitative content analysis.个性化单节反馈干预对饮食失调症的可接受性:一项定性内容分析
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 10;13(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01333-8.
3
Medical management and differential diagnosis of restrictive eating disorders in men: a case study report with co-produced recommendations.
男性限制性饮食失调的医学管理与鉴别诊断:一份共同制定建议的病例研究报告
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01250-w.
4
A family navigator improves post-discharge treatment adherence among adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a pilot study.家庭导航员可提高神经性厌食症青少年出院后的治疗依从性:一项试点研究。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 12;13(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01315-w.
5
"I thought if my parents got involved, then they'd make me get better": emerging adults' experiences of support from family and friends during anorexia nervosa.“我认为如果我的父母介入,他们会让我好转”:青少年在神经性厌食症期间从家人和朋友那里获得支持的经历
J Eat Disord. 2025 May 12;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01260-8.
6
Open Pilot Trial of a Coached Digital Program for Lower-Income Adults With Eating Disorders.针对低收入饮食失调成年人的辅导数字项目开放试点试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Aug;58(8):1535-1546. doi: 10.1002/eat.24459. Epub 2025 May 12.
7
Exploring Therapists' Approaches to Treating Eating Disorders to Inform User-Centric App Design: Web-Based Interview Study.探索治疗师治疗饮食失调症的方法以指导以用户为中心的应用程序设计:基于网络的访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 6;9:e68846. doi: 10.2196/68846.
8
Virtual Versus In-Person Intensive Outpatient Treatment for Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic in United States-Based Treatment Facilities: Naturalistic Study.美国治疗机构在新冠疫情期间针对饮食失调症的虚拟与面对面强化门诊治疗:自然主义研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 2;27:e66465. doi: 10.2196/66465.
9
Self-Guided Psychological Interventions for the Treatment and Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.用于治疗和预防饮食失调的自我引导式心理干预:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2025 Sep;33(5):984-994. doi: 10.1002/erv.3201. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
10
Mobile App-Delivered Motivational Interviewing for Women on Eating Disorder Treatment Waitlists (MI-Coach: ED): Protocol for an App Development and Pilot Evaluation.针对处于饮食失调治疗等候名单上的女性的移动应用程序提供的动机性访谈(MI-Coach:ED):应用程序开发和试点评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 10;14:e66298. doi: 10.2196/66298.