Sharma Parul, Rai Sujeet, Tripathi Manoj, Malviya Deepak, Kumari Sumita, Mishra Smarika
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):42-48. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_23_22. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.
We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.
The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.
The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.
OLP was significantly higher ( = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation ( > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.
Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.
由于具有减少气道操作和稳定血流动力学等多种优势,声门上气道装置(SAD)已被证明是腹腔镜手术中气管插管的合适替代方案。
我们比较了喉罩气道(LMA)-Supreme(LMA-S)、i-gel和Baska面罩在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的口咽漏气压(OLP)疗效和安全性。
在一家三级医疗中心,选择90例计划进行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究。
根据使用的不同SAD,将研究分为三组,每组30例:使用LMA-Supreme的LS组、使用i-gel的IG组和使用Baska面罩的BM组。次要目标是三组之间的装置插入时间、插入难易程度、气道峰压(PAP)、心率、平均动脉压的变化以及气道并发症(咽痛、吞咽困难、声音嘶哑、唇/舌或牙齿损伤等)。
定量数据采用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni多重比较检验进行分析。定性数据采用卡方检验进行比较。
在插入后及气腹期间,Baska面罩的OLP显著高于i-gel组和LMA-S组(P = 0.005)。在装置插入时间、尝试次数、插入难易程度和操作使用方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,BM组的胃管插入时间(9.59±2.78)显著低于IG组的12.79±3.47和LS组的10.84±3.68(P<0.05)。在不同时间间隔的PAP、心率、平均动脉压变化以及并发症方面,各组之间无显著差异。
在腹腔镜手术中,Baska面罩与i-gel和LMA-S相比,提供了显著更高的OLP,且气道发病率无显著差异。