Suppr超能文献

《平价医疗法案》(ACA)对医疗保险优势计划中有利风险选择和受益人群健康状况的影响:初步评估

The impact of the affordable care Act (ACA) on favorable risk selection and Beneficiaries' health status in Medicare advantage: a preliminary assessment.

作者信息

Natafgi Nabil, Nattinger Matthew, Ugwi Patience, Ullrich Fred, Wolinsky Fredric D

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health University of Iowa, 145 River Side Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52241, USA.

Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1663-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In response to increasing fiscal pressures, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to reduce Medicare Advantage plan expenses by restructuring the bidding and payment processes. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of the ACA's payment freeze and restructuring of the bidding and payment processes on favorable risk selection in Medicare Advantage plan enrollment (objective 1) and changes in the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans over time (objective 2).

METHODS

We used the Medicare Health Outcome Survey baseline data (2007→2013) for analyses of the first objective (7 cohorts, 1.7 million beneficiaries) and the linked baseline and follow-up data (2007-2009→2011-2013) for analyses of the second objective (5 cohorts, 0.5 million beneficiaries). To examine favorable risk selection we used the following outcomes: self-rated health, falls, balance problems, falls management, frailty, and morbidity. To examine changes in beneficiary health status over time, we examined changes (over time) in these same outcomes. The focal independent variable is the policy implementation measure, which is time dependent and measures the accumulation of changes to Medicare Advantage payment policies resulting from the ACA. Multiple regression models were developed to examine the relationship between ACA implementation and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

In terms of favorable selection, individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans post-ACA have, on average, better self-rated health (b = 0.003, p < 0.01), lower odds of falls (AOR = 0.981, p < 0.001), higher odds of falls management (AOR = 1.040, p < 0.001), lower frailty risks (IRR = 0.983, p < 0.001), and lower risks of comorbidities (IRR = 0.989, p < 0.001). In terms of health status changes over time, the results indicate that in the post-ACA period, beneficiaries reported better self-rated health (b = 0.028, p < 0.001), lower odds of falls (AOR = 0.965, p < 0.001), lower odds of balance problems (AOR = 0.958, p < 0.001), lower odds of falls management (AOR = 0.981, p < 0.05), lower frailty risks (IRR = 0.944, p < 0.001), and lower risks of comorbidity (IRR = 0.986, p < 0.001) at follow up compared to the same risks at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that as the Medicare Advantage payment policies in the ACA were being implemented, plans may have engaged in favorable selection activities, yet beneficiaries exhibited more favorable health outcomes.

摘要

背景

为应对日益增加的财政压力,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)试图通过重组投标和支付流程来降低医疗保险优势计划的费用。本研究的目的是评估ACA的支付冻结以及投标和支付流程的重组对医疗保险优势计划参保中的有利风险选择(目标1)以及随着时间推移参加医疗保险优势计划的受益人的健康状况变化(目标2)的影响。

方法

我们使用医疗保险健康结果调查基线数据(2007→2013年)来分析第一个目标(7个队列,170万受益人),并使用关联的基线和随访数据(2007 - 2009年→2011 - 2013年)来分析第二个目标(5个队列,50万受益人)。为了研究有利的风险选择,我们使用了以下结果指标:自评健康、跌倒、平衡问题、跌倒管理、虚弱和发病率。为了研究受益人健康状况随时间的变化,我们考察了这些相同结果指标随时间的变化。核心自变量是政策实施指标,它随时间变化,并衡量了ACA导致的医疗保险优势支付政策变化的累积情况。我们建立了多元回归模型来研究ACA实施与感兴趣的结果之间的关系。

结果

在有利选择方面,ACA实施后参加医疗保险优势计划的个体平均有更好的自评健康(b = 0.003,p < 0.01)、更低的跌倒几率(AOR = 0.981,p < 0.001)、更高的跌倒管理几率(AOR = 1.040,p < 0.001)、更低的虚弱风险(IRR = 0.983,p < 0.001)以及更低的合并症风险(IRR = 0.989,p < 0.001)。在健康状况随时间的变化方面,结果表明在ACA实施后期间,与基线时相同风险相比,随访时受益人报告有更好的自评健康(b = 0.028,p < 0.001)、更低的跌倒几率(AOR = 0.965,p < 0.001)、更低的平衡问题几率(AOR = 0.958,p < 0.001)、更低的跌倒管理几率(AOR = 0.981,p < 0.05)、更低的虚弱风险(IRR = 0.944,p < 0.001)以及更低的合并症风险(IRR = 0.986,p < 0.001)。

结论

这些发现表明,随着ACA中的医疗保险优势支付政策的实施,计划可能进行了有利的选择活动,但受益人表现出了更有利的健康结果。

相似文献

2
Medicare Advantage Financing and Quality in Puerto Rico vs the 50 US States and Washington, DC.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Sep 2;3(9):e223073. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3073.
3
Medicare Advantage update: benefits, enrollment, and payments after the ACA.
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2013 Jul 19(850):1-12.
4
Are Press Depictions of Affordable Care Act Beneficiaries Favorable to Policy Durability?
Politics Life Sci. 2015 Fall;34(2):7-43. doi: 10.1017/pls.2015.16.
5
Rural Medicare Advantage Plan Payment in 2015.
Rural Policy Brief. 2015 Dec 1(2015 12):1-5.
7
The impact of the Affordable Care Act on Medicare Advantage plan availability and enrollment.
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2339-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01426.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
9
Growth of Medicare Advantage After Plan Payment Reductions.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231744. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1744.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Oct;104(10):3335-64. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3335.
2
High-Cost Patients Had Substantial Rates Of Leaving Medicare Advantage And Joining Traditional Medicare.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1675-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0272.
3
HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?
Am J Health Econ. 2015 Winter;1(1):1-26. doi: 10.1162/AJHE_a_00001.
4
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Medicare Payment Reform: Aligning Incentives for Better Care.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jun;20:1-12.
7
At least half of new Medicare advantage enrollees had switched from traditional Medicare during 2006-11.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):48-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0218.
10
Medicare Advantage update: benefits, enrollment, and payments after the ACA.
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2013 Jul 19(850):1-12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验