• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高成本患者退出医保优势计划并加入传统医疗保险的比例相当高。

High-Cost Patients Had Substantial Rates Of Leaving Medicare Advantage And Joining Traditional Medicare.

作者信息

Rahman Momotazur, Keohane Laura, Trivedi Amal N, Mor Vincent

机构信息

Momotazur Rahman (

Laura Keohane is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Policy at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, in Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1675-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0272.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0272
PMID:26438743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4676406/
Abstract

Medicare Advantage payment regulations include risk-adjusted capitated reimbursement, which was implemented to discourage favorable risk selection and encourage the retention of members who incur high costs. However, the extent to which risk-adjusted capitation has succeeded is not clear, especially for members using high-cost services not previously considered in assessments of risk selection. We examined the rates at which participants who used three high-cost services switched between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare. We found that the switching rate from 2010 to 2011 away from Medicare Advantage and to traditional Medicare exceeded the switching rate in the opposite direction for participants who used long-term nursing home care (17 percent versus 3 percent), short-term nursing home care (9 percent versus 4 percent), and home health care (8 percent versus 3 percent). These results were magnified among people who were enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid. Our findings raise questions about the role of Medicare Advantage plans in serving high-cost patients with complex care needs, who account for a disproportionately high amount of total health care spending.

摘要

医疗保险优势计划支付规定包括风险调整后的按人头付费报销,实施该规定是为了抑制有利的风险选择行为,并鼓励留住高成本参保人员。然而,风险调整后的按人头付费取得成功的程度尚不清楚,尤其是对于那些使用高成本服务的参保人员而言,而这些服务在风险选择评估中以前并未被考虑在内。我们研究了使用三种高成本服务的参保人员在医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险之间转换的比率。我们发现,对于使用长期疗养院护理服务(转换率为17% 对3%)、短期疗养院护理服务(9% 对4%)和家庭保健服务(8% 对3%)的参保人员,从2010年到2011年,从医疗保险优势计划转向传统医疗保险的转换率超过了相反方向的转换率。在同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划的人群中,这些结果更为明显。我们的研究结果引发了关于医疗保险优势计划在为有复杂护理需求的高成本患者提供服务方面所起作用的疑问,这些患者在医疗保健总支出中所占比例过高。

相似文献

1
High-Cost Patients Had Substantial Rates Of Leaving Medicare Advantage And Joining Traditional Medicare.高成本患者退出医保优势计划并加入传统医疗保险的比例相当高。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1675-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0272.
2
Health Care Expenditures After Initiating Long-term Services and Supports in the Community Versus in a Nursing Facility.在社区与护理机构开始接受长期服务和支持后的医疗保健支出。
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000491.
3
The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.需求证明法对疗养院和家庭医疗保健支出的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Feb;73(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1077558715597161. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
4
Cost savings from home and community-based services: Arizona's capitated Medicaid long-term care program.家庭和社区服务带来的成本节约:亚利桑那州的按人头付费医疗补助长期护理项目。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Dec;22(6):1329-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-6-1329.
5
National health expenditures, 1995.1995年国家卫生支出
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):175-214.
6
Long-term care: who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much?长期护理:谁需要它,谁提供它,谁支付,以及支付多少?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0535.
7
Hospice effect on government expenditures among nursing home residents.临终关怀对养老院居民政府支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):134-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00746.x.
8
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
How to share the burden. Long-term care reform in the 1990s.如何分担负担。20世纪90年代的长期护理改革。
Brookings Rev. 1994 Spring;12(2):16-21.
10
The effect of longevity on spending for acute and long-term care.长寿对急性和长期护理支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1409-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421906.

引用本文的文献

1
Older adults living with dementia enrolled in similar Medicare Advantage plans compared to those without dementia.与没有痴呆症的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的老年人参加了类似的医疗保险优势计划。
Alzheimers Dement Behav Socioecon Aging. 2025 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1002/bsa3.70016. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes enrolled in Medicare by age and insurance type.按年龄和保险类型划分的参加医疗保险的美国成年糖尿病确诊患者。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jul 1;56:103157. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103157. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
The effect of providing Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer additional time to reassess enrollment.为被诊断患有癌症的医疗保险优势计划参保人提供额外时间以重新评估参保情况的影响。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jun 27;3(7):qxaf131. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf131. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.双重资格特殊需求计划的参保情况及退保率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251748. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748.
5
Medigap Protection and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees With Cancer.癌症患者医疗保险优势参保者中的医疗补助保险保护与计划转换
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e252018. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2018.
6
Understanding the Effect of Race on Medicare Advantage Enrollment.了解种族对医疗保险优势参保情况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14464. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14464. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
7
Examining Trends in Medicare Advantage Plan Disenrollment Associated With Expanded Supplemental Benefit Adoption.审视与扩大补充福利采用相关的医疗保险优势计划退保趋势。
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14460. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14460. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
8
Switching between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare for individuals newly diagnosed with cancer 2015-2019.2015 - 2019年新诊断癌症患者在医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险之间的转换情况
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jun 1;117(6):1218-1227. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf036.
9
The Effect of Extending the Window to Disenroll From Medicare Advantage Among Post-Acute Users.延长急性后期使用者退出医疗保险优势计划期限的影响
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Apr;82(2):165-172. doi: 10.1177/10775587241313092. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
10
"It is not the fault of the health care team - it is the way the system works": a mixed-methods quality improvement study of patients with advanced cancer and family members reveals challenges navigating a fragmented healthcare system and the administrative and financial burdens of care.“这不是医疗团队的错——而是系统的运作方式”:一项针对晚期癌症患者及其家属的混合方法质量改进研究揭示了在零碎的医疗体系中所面临的挑战,以及医疗照护的行政和经济负担。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11744-z.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.风险选择如何应对风险调整?来自医疗保险优势计划的新证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Oct;104(10):3335-64. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3335.
2
At least half of new Medicare advantage enrollees had switched from traditional Medicare during 2006-11.在2006年至2011年期间,至少有一半的医疗保险优势计划新参保人是从传统医疗保险转换而来的。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):48-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0218.
3
Higher Medicare SNF care utilization by dual-eligible beneficiaries: can Medicaid long-term care policies be the answer?双重资格受益人的医疗保险 SNF 护理利用率较高:医疗补助长期护理政策能否成为答案?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):161-79. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12204. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
How successful is Medicare Advantage?医疗保险优势计划的成功率如何?
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):351-94. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12061.
5
Dual Eligibility, Selection of Skilled Nursing Facility, and Length of Medicare Paid Postacute Stay.双重资格、熟练护理机构的选择以及医疗保险支付的急性后期住院时长。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Aug;71(4):384-401. doi: 10.1177/1077558714533824. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Geographic variation in health care spending in the United States: insights from an Institute of Medicine report.美国医疗保健支出的地理差异:来自医学研究所一份报告的见解。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 25;310(12):1227-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278139.
7
Using shared savings to foster coordinated care for dual eligibles.利用共享储蓄来促进对双重资格者的协调护理。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):404-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1214155. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
8
New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.新的风险调整系统与医疗保险优势中有利选择的减少有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2630-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1344.
9
Steps to reduce favorable risk selection in medicare advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges.降低医疗保险优势中有利风险选择的步骤在很大程度上取得了成功,这为医疗保险交易所带来了良好的前景。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2618-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0345.
10
Favorable selection, risk adjustment, and the Medicare Advantage program.有利选择、风险调整与医疗保险优势计划。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1039-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 22.