Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势计划合同特征与医疗质量评级之间的关系:对医疗保险优势星级评级的观测性分析。

Relationships between Medicare Advantage contract characteristics and quality-of-care ratings: an observational analysis of Medicare Advantage star ratings.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):353-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-0332.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes star ratings on Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts to measure plan quality of care with implications for reimbursement and bonuses.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether MA contract characteristics are associated with quality of care through the Medicare plan star ratings.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of MA star ratings in 2010. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable linear regression models assessed the relationship between 5-star rating summary scores and plan characteristics.

SETTING

CMS MA contracts nationally.

PARTICIPANTS

409 (71%) of a total of 575 MA contracts, covering 10.56 million Medicare beneficiaries (90% of the MA population) in the United States in 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

The MA quality ratings summary score (stars range from 1 to 5) is a quality measure based on 36 indicators related to processes of care, health outcomes, access to care, and beneficiary satisfaction.

RESULTS

Nonprofit, larger, and older MA contracts were more likely to receive higher star ratings. Star ratings ranged from 2 to 5. Nonprofit contracts received an average 0.55 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) higher star ratings than for-profit contracts (P  < 0.001) after controls were set for contract characteristics.

LIMITATION

The study focused on persons aged 65 years or older covered by MA.

CONCLUSION

In 2010, nonprofit MA contracts received significantly higher star ratings than for-profit contracts. When comparing health plans in the future, the CMS should give increasing attention to for-profit plans with lower quality ratings and consider developing programs to assist newer and smaller plans in improving their care for Medicare beneficiaries.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

摘要

背景

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)发布医疗保险优势(MA)合同的星级评分,以衡量计划的护理质量,这对报销和奖金有影响。

目的

研究 MA 合同特征是否与通过医疗保险计划星级评分的护理质量有关。

设计

对 2010 年 MA 星级评分的回顾性研究。未调整和调整后的多变量线性回归模型评估了五星级评分综合得分与计划特征之间的关系。

设置

CMS 的 MA 合同在全国范围内。

参与者

2010 年,在美国共有 575 份 MA 合同,覆盖了 1056 万医疗保险受益人(MA 人群的 90%),其中 409 份(71%)MA 合同。

测量

MA 质量评分综合得分(星级范围为 1 到 5)是基于与护理过程、健康结果、获得护理的机会和受益人的满意度相关的 36 个指标的质量衡量标准。

结果

非营利性、规模较大和较老的 MA 合同更有可能获得更高的星级评分。星级评分范围从 2 到 5。在控制合同特征后,非营利性合同比营利性合同获得的星级评分平均高出 0.55(95%置信区间,0.42 至 0.67)(P < 0.001)。

局限性

该研究侧重于由 MA 覆盖的 65 岁及以上的人。

结论

在 2010 年,非营利性 MA 合同获得的星级评分明显高于营利性合同。在未来比较健康计划时,CMS 应更加关注星级评分较低的营利性计划,并考虑制定计划,帮助新的和较小的计划改善其对医疗保险受益人的护理。

主要资金来源

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验