Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):353-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-0332.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes star ratings on Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts to measure plan quality of care with implications for reimbursement and bonuses.
To investigate whether MA contract characteristics are associated with quality of care through the Medicare plan star ratings.
Retrospective study of MA star ratings in 2010. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable linear regression models assessed the relationship between 5-star rating summary scores and plan characteristics.
CMS MA contracts nationally.
409 (71%) of a total of 575 MA contracts, covering 10.56 million Medicare beneficiaries (90% of the MA population) in the United States in 2010.
The MA quality ratings summary score (stars range from 1 to 5) is a quality measure based on 36 indicators related to processes of care, health outcomes, access to care, and beneficiary satisfaction.
Nonprofit, larger, and older MA contracts were more likely to receive higher star ratings. Star ratings ranged from 2 to 5. Nonprofit contracts received an average 0.55 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) higher star ratings than for-profit contracts (P < 0.001) after controls were set for contract characteristics.
The study focused on persons aged 65 years or older covered by MA.
In 2010, nonprofit MA contracts received significantly higher star ratings than for-profit contracts. When comparing health plans in the future, the CMS should give increasing attention to for-profit plans with lower quality ratings and consider developing programs to assist newer and smaller plans in improving their care for Medicare beneficiaries.
None.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)发布医疗保险优势(MA)合同的星级评分,以衡量计划的护理质量,这对报销和奖金有影响。
研究 MA 合同特征是否与通过医疗保险计划星级评分的护理质量有关。
对 2010 年 MA 星级评分的回顾性研究。未调整和调整后的多变量线性回归模型评估了五星级评分综合得分与计划特征之间的关系。
CMS 的 MA 合同在全国范围内。
2010 年,在美国共有 575 份 MA 合同,覆盖了 1056 万医疗保险受益人(MA 人群的 90%),其中 409 份(71%)MA 合同。
MA 质量评分综合得分(星级范围为 1 到 5)是基于与护理过程、健康结果、获得护理的机会和受益人的满意度相关的 36 个指标的质量衡量标准。
非营利性、规模较大和较老的 MA 合同更有可能获得更高的星级评分。星级评分范围从 2 到 5。在控制合同特征后,非营利性合同比营利性合同获得的星级评分平均高出 0.55(95%置信区间,0.42 至 0.67)(P < 0.001)。
该研究侧重于由 MA 覆盖的 65 岁及以上的人。
在 2010 年,非营利性 MA 合同获得的星级评分明显高于营利性合同。在未来比较健康计划时,CMS 应更加关注星级评分较低的营利性计划,并考虑制定计划,帮助新的和较小的计划改善其对医疗保险受益人的护理。
无。