• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下艾布拉姆斯胸膜活检与CT引导下切割针胸膜活检在恶性胸膜疾病中的应用:一项3年随访研究

Ultrasound-Guided Abrams Pleural Biopsy vs CT-Guided Tru-Cut Pleural Biopsy in Malignant Pleural Disease, a 3-Year Follow-up Study.

作者信息

Sivakumar Parthipan, Jayaram Deepak, Rao Deepak, Dhileepan Vignesh, Ahmed Irfan, Ahmed Liju

机构信息

Kings College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.

East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, RH1 5RH, UK.

出版信息

Lung. 2016 Dec;194(6):911-916. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9933-9. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00408-016-9933-9
PMID:27540734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5093211/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Conventional Abrams biopsy shows low sensitivity in suspected malignant pleural disease. There are limited data on the improvement in sensitivity by adding in image guidance. This retrospective study compares the diagnostic sensitivity of Abrams biopsy using ultrasound guidance with CT-guided Tru-Cut biopsy in suspected malignant pleural disease.

METHODS

Data were collected from 2006 to 2012 of patients who underwent image-guided biopsies for suspected non-tuberculous pleural disease. Data were collected on the result of the initial biopsy and final patient diagnosis as of June 2015.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients underwent image-guided Abrams biopsy and 29 underwent CT-guided Tru-Cut biopsies. The sensitivity of Abrams was 71.43 % compared to 75 % in the CT-guided Tru-Cut group. Specificity was 100 % in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided Abrams biopsies demonstrate comparable diagnostic sensitivity in malignant pleural disease to CT-guided Tru-Cut biopsy.

摘要

目的

传统的 Abrams 活检在疑似恶性胸膜疾病中显示出较低的敏感性。关于通过添加图像引导提高敏感性的数据有限。这项回顾性研究比较了在疑似恶性胸膜疾病中,超声引导下的 Abrams 活检与 CT 引导下的 Tru-Cut 活检的诊断敏感性。

方法

收集 2006 年至 2012 年因疑似非结核性胸膜疾病接受图像引导活检的患者数据。收集初始活检结果和截至 2015 年 6 月的最终患者诊断数据。

结果

63 例患者接受了图像引导的 Abrams 活检,29 例接受了 CT 引导的 Tru-Cut 活检。Abrams 活检的敏感性为 71.43%,而 CT 引导的 Tru-Cut 组为 75%。两组的特异性均为 100%。

结论

图像引导的 Abrams 活检在恶性胸膜疾病中的诊断敏感性与 CT 引导的 Tru-Cut 活检相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/982cbe849d8a/408_2016_9933_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/f236050f662e/408_2016_9933_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/7f20709495cb/408_2016_9933_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/982cbe849d8a/408_2016_9933_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/f236050f662e/408_2016_9933_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/7f20709495cb/408_2016_9933_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caac/5093211/982cbe849d8a/408_2016_9933_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Abrams Pleural Biopsy vs CT-Guided Tru-Cut Pleural Biopsy in Malignant Pleural Disease, a 3-Year Follow-up Study.超声引导下艾布拉姆斯胸膜活检与CT引导下切割针胸膜活检在恶性胸膜疾病中的应用:一项3年随访研究
Lung. 2016 Dec;194(6):911-916. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9933-9. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
2
Ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy with Tru-Cut needle.超声引导下使用Tru-Cut针进行胸膜活检。
Chest. 1991 Nov;100(5):1328-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.5.1328.
3
Prospective Study of the Utility of Computed Tomography Triage of Pleural Biopsy Strategies in Patients With Pleural Diseases.胸膜疾病患者胸膜活检策略的计算机断层扫描分诊效用的前瞻性研究。
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2019 Jul;26(3):210-218. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000559.
4
Direct comparison of the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-assisted Abrams and Tru-Cut needle biopsies for pleural tuberculosis.超声引导下 Abrams 针与 Tru-Cut 针活检对胸膜结核的诊断效能直接比较。
Thorax. 2010 Oct;65(10):857-62. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.125146. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
5
Percutaneous image-guided cutting needle biopsy of the pleura in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.经皮影像引导下胸膜切割针活检在恶性间皮瘤诊断中的应用
Chest. 2001 Dec;120(6):1798-802. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1798.
6
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Small Pleural Lesions: Diagnostic Yield and Impact of CT and Ultrasound Characteristics.超声引导经皮穿刺活检用于胸膜小结节:CT 和超声特征的诊断效能及影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):699-706. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24120. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial.标准胸膜活检与CT引导下切割针活检对胸腔积液中恶性疾病的诊断:一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2003 Apr 19;361(9366):1326-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13079-6.
8
Thoracic ultrasound-assisted selection for pleural biopsy with Abrams needle.Abrams 针经胸超声引导胸膜活检的选择。
Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1949-54. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02378. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
Comparison of the Tru-cut biopsy needle with the Abrams punch for pleural biopsy.Tru-cut活检针与Abrams穿刺器用于胸膜活检的比较。
Thorax. 1989 Oct;44(10):794-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.44.10.794.
10
Image-guided pleural biopsy: diagnostic yield and complications.影像引导下经皮胸膜活检:诊断率及并发症
Clin Radiol. 2006 Aug;61(8):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.05.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Needle Biopsy Which Needle for Which Patient: A Prospective Randomized Study.超声引导下经皮胸膜针刺活检:何种患者选用何种穿刺针——一项前瞻性随机研究
Balkan Med J. 2025 Jul 1;42(4):321-328. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2025.2025-4-90.
2
Impact of pleural thickness on the sensitivity of computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion.胸膜厚度对计算机断层扫描引导下切割针胸膜活检诊断不明原因渗出性胸腔积液敏感性的影响。
Respir Res. 2025 Apr 18;26(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2.
3
CT-guided transthoracic core needle biopsies of focal pleural lesions smaller than 10 mm: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Pleural controversies: image guided biopsy vs. thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusions?胸膜疾病的争议:对于不明原因的胸腔积液,影像引导下活检与胸腔镜检查该如何选择?
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Jun;7(6):1041-51. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.36.
2
Tru-cut needle pleural biopsy and cytology as the initial procedure in the evaluation of pleural effusion.经皮针刺胸膜活检和细胞学检查作为胸腔积液评估的初始程序。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2014 Aug;50(8):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
3
Image-guided pleural biopsy.影像引导下胸膜活检。
CT 引导下经胸壁穿刺活检 10mm 以下局限性胸膜病变:一项回顾性研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 May 22;23(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00569-4.
4
Ultrasound-Guided versus Thoracoscopic Pleural Biopsy for Diagnosing Tuberculous Pleurisy Following Inconclusive Thoracentesis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.超声引导与胸腔镜胸膜活检对诊断胸腔穿刺术结果不明确的结核性胸膜炎的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Oct 10;24:7238-7248. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912506.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013 Jul;19(4):368-73. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f4c23.
4
Thoracic ultrasound-assisted selection for pleural biopsy with Abrams needle.Abrams 针经胸超声引导胸膜活检的选择。
Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1949-54. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02378. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Medical thoracoscopy vs CT scan-guided Abrams pleural needle biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pleural effusions: a randomized, controlled trial.内科胸腔镜与 CT 引导下 Abrams 胸膜活检针用于胸腔积液患者诊断的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Chest. 2010 Jun;137(6):1362-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0884. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
6
Direct comparison of the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-assisted Abrams and Tru-Cut needle biopsies for pleural tuberculosis.超声引导下 Abrams 针与 Tru-Cut 针活检对胸膜结核的诊断效能直接比较。
Thorax. 2010 Oct;65(10):857-62. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.125146. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
7
Chronic sterile empyema.慢性无菌性脓胸
QJM. 2010 May;103(5):355. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp131. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
Thoracic ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.胸部超声在恶性胸腔积液诊断中的应用
Thorax. 2009 Feb;64(2):139-43. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.100545. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
9
The role of Abrams percutaneous pleural biopsy in the investigation of exudative pleural effusions.艾布拉姆斯经皮胸膜活检在渗出性胸腔积液检查中的作用。
Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1549-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1549.
10
Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial.标准胸膜活检与CT引导下切割针活检对胸腔积液中恶性疾病的诊断:一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2003 Apr 19;361(9366):1326-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13079-6.