Suppr超能文献

Abrams 针经胸超声引导胸膜活检的选择。

Thoracic ultrasound-assisted selection for pleural biopsy with Abrams needle.

机构信息

Bronchopleural Unit, Department of Pneumology.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1949-54. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02378. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Closed pleural biopsy (CPB) in patients with malignant pleural effusion is less sensitive than cytology. Ultrasound-assisted CPB allows biopsies to be performed in the lower thoracic parietal pleura, where secondary spread from pleural metastases is initially more likely to be found. We analyzed whether choosing the point of entry for CPB with thoracic ultrasound assistance influences the diagnostic yield in malignant pleural effusion.

METHODS

This prospective study included patients who underwent CPB performed by an experienced pulmonologist in 2008-2010 (group A) and thoracic ultrasound was used to select the biopsy site. The results were compared with a historical series of CPB performed by the same pulmonologist without the assistance of thoracic ultrasound (group B). An Abrams needle was used in all cases. We analyzed the obtaining of pleural tissue and the diagnostic yield.

RESULTS

We included 114 CPBs from group A (23% tuberculous pleural effusion, 27% malignant pleural effusion) and 67 CPBs from group B (24% tuberculous pleural effusion, 30% malignant pleural effusion) (P = .70). Pleural tissue was obtained in 96.5% of the group A CPBs and 89.6% of the group B CPBs (P = .05). The diagnostic yields of CPB for tuberculous pleural effusion and malignant pleural effusion in group A were 89.5% and 77.4%, respectively, and 91.7% and 60%, respectively, in group B (P = .80 for tuberculous pleural effusion, and P = .18 for malignant pleural effusion).

CONCLUSIONS

Selecting the point of entry for CPB using thoracic ultrasound increases the likelihood of obtaining pleural tissue and the diagnostic yield, but without statistical significance. We recommend ultrasound-assisted CPB to investigate pleural effusion, since the diagnostic yield of a pleural biopsy with an Abrams needle increased by > 17% in subjects with malignant pleural effusion.

摘要

背景

与细胞学相比,闭式胸膜活检(CPB)在恶性胸腔积液患者中的敏感性较低。超声辅助 CPB 可在胸壁下部胸膜进行活检,在该处,胸膜转移的继发性扩散最初更有可能被发现。我们分析了在超声引导下选择 CPB 进针点是否会影响恶性胸腔积液的诊断率。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2008 年至 2010 年间由一位经验丰富的肺病学家进行 CPB 的患者(A 组),并使用胸腔超声选择活检部位。结果与同一位肺病学家在没有胸腔超声辅助的情况下进行的历史 CPB 系列(B 组)进行了比较。所有病例均使用 Abrams 针。我们分析了胸膜组织的获取情况和诊断率。

结果

A 组包括 114 例 CPB(23%结核性胸腔积液,27%恶性胸腔积液),B 组包括 67 例 CPB(24%结核性胸腔积液,30%恶性胸腔积液)(P=.70)。A 组 CPB 胸膜组织获取率为 96.5%,B 组为 89.6%(P=.05)。A 组 CPB 诊断结核性胸腔积液和恶性胸腔积液的阳性率分别为 89.5%和 77.4%,B 组分别为 91.7%和 60%(结核性胸腔积液 P=.80,恶性胸腔积液 P=.18)。

结论

使用胸腔超声选择 CPB 的进针点可增加获得胸膜组织和诊断率的可能性,但无统计学意义。我们建议对胸腔积液进行超声辅助 CPB,因为在恶性胸腔积液患者中,Abrams 针胸膜活检的诊断率增加了>17%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验