Department of Neurology, National Reference Center for "PPA and rare dementias", Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Brain & Spine Institute, ICM-UMR INSERM-CNRS-UPMC 1127, Frontlab team, Paris, France.
Ann Neurol. 2016 Nov;80(5):693-707. doi: 10.1002/ana.24766. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive brain stimulation in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a promising approach. Yet, applied to single cases or insufficiently controlled small-cohort studies, it has not clarified its therapeutic value. We here address the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the semantic PPA variant (sv-PPA), applying a rigorous study design to a large, homogeneous sv-PPA cohort. METHODS: Using a double-blind, sham-controlled counterbalanced cross-over design, we applied three tDCS conditions targeting the temporal poles of 12 sv-PPA patients. Efficiency was assessed by a semantic matching task orthogonally manipulating "living"/"nonliving" categories and verbal/visual modalities. Conforming to predominantly left-lateralized damage in sv-PPA and accounts of interhemispheric inhibition, we applied left hemisphere anodal-excitatory and right hemisphere cathodal-inhibitory tDCS, compared to sham stimulation. RESULTS: Prestimulation data, compared to 15 healthy controls, showed that patients had semantic disorders predominating with living categories in the verbal modality. Stimulation selectively impacted these most impaired domains: Left-excitatory and right-inhibitory tDCS improved semantic accuracy in verbal modality, and right-inhibitory tDCS improved processing speed with living categories and accuracy and processing speed in the combined verbal × living condition. INTERPRETATION: Our findings demonstrate the efficiency of tDCS in sv-PPA by generating highly specific intrasemantic effects. They provide "proof of concept" for future applications of tDCS in therapeutic multiday regimes, potentially driving sustained improvement of semantic processing. Our data also support the hotly debated existence of a left temporal-pole network for verbal semantics selectively modulated through both left-excitatory and right-inhibitory brain stimulation. Ann Neurol 2016;80:693-707.
目的:非侵入性脑刺激在原发性进行性失语症(PPA)中是一种很有前途的方法。然而,应用于单一病例或控制不佳的小队列研究,它并没有阐明其治疗价值。我们在这里研究经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对语义原发性进行性失语症(sv-PPA)变异型的有效性,对一个大的、同质的 sv-PPA 队列应用严格的研究设计。
方法:我们采用双盲、假刺激对照平衡交叉设计,对 12 名 sv-PPA 患者的颞极进行了三种 tDCS 条件的应用。通过语义匹配任务对“有生命/无生命”类别和言语/视觉模态进行正交操作,评估效率。根据 sv-PPA 中主要左侧病变和对侧半球抑制的解释,我们应用了左半球阳极兴奋和右半球阴极抑制 tDCS,与假刺激进行比较。
结果:与 15 名健康对照相比,预处理数据显示患者在言语模态中有以有生命类别为主的语义障碍。刺激选择性地影响了这些最受损的领域:左兴奋和右抑制 tDCS 改善了言语模态中的语义准确性,右抑制 tDCS 改善了有生命类别的处理速度以及在言语×有生命联合条件下的准确性和处理速度。
结论:我们的发现通过产生高度特定的内语义效应,证明了 tDCS 在 sv-PPA 中的有效性。它们为 tDCS 在治疗多天方案中的未来应用提供了“概念验证”,有可能促进语义处理的持续改善。我们的数据还支持了一个有争议的观点,即言语语义的左颞极网络存在选择性地通过左兴奋和右抑制脑刺激进行调节。神经病学年鉴 2016;80:693-707。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023
Sci Rep. 2023-1-13