• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多部位经颅直流电刺激治疗原发性进行性失语症并不优于言语治疗。

Multifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy.

机构信息

Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive disorders Unit. Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institutd'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Insitute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(3):1169-1180. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230069.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-230069
PMID:37182884
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a group of neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia characterized by language deterioration. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive intervention for brain dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of tDCS combined with speech therapy in the three variants of PPA. We evaluate changes in fMRI activity in a subset of patients.

METHODS

Double-blinded, randomized, cross-over, and sham-controlled tDCS study. 15 patients with PPA were included. Each patient underwent two interventions: a) speech therapy + active tDCS and b) speech therapy + sham tDCS stimulation. A multifocal strategy with anodes placed in the left frontal and parietal regions was used to stimulate the entire language network. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the results of two independent sets of neuropsychological assessments administered at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention. In a subsample, fMRI scanning was performed before and after each intervention.

RESULTS

The interventions were well tolerated. Participants in both arms showed clinical improvement, but no differences were found between active and sham tDCS interventions in any of the evaluations. There were trends toward better outcomes in the active tDCS group for semantic association and reading skills. fMRI identified an activity increase in the right frontal medial cortex and the bilateral paracingulate gyrus after the active tDCS intervention.

CONCLUSION

We did not find differences between active and sham tDCS stimulation in clinical scores of language function in PPA patients.

摘要

背景

原发性进行性失语症(PPA)是一组神经退行性疾病,包括以语言恶化为特征的阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种治疗大脑功能障碍的非侵入性干预措施。

目的

评估 tDCS 联合言语治疗在 PPA 三种变体中的耐受性和疗效。我们评估了一部分患者的 fMRI 活动变化。

方法

双盲、随机、交叉和假刺激 tDCS 研究。纳入 15 名 PPA 患者。每位患者接受两种干预措施:a)言语治疗+主动 tDCS 和 b)言语治疗+假 tDCS 刺激。使用多焦点策略,将阳极放置在左额和顶叶区域,以刺激整个语言网络。通过比较两组独立的神经心理学评估结果来评估疗效,这些评估结果在基线、干预后立即以及干预后 1 个月和 3 个月进行。在亚样本中,在每次干预前后进行 fMRI 扫描。

结果

干预措施耐受性良好。两组参与者均表现出临床改善,但在任何评估中,主动 tDCS 干预与假刺激 tDCS 干预之间均未发现差异。在主动 tDCS 组中,语义联想和阅读技能的结果有更好的趋势。fMRI 显示,在主动 tDCS 干预后,右侧额内侧皮质和双侧旁中央回的活动增加。

结论

我们没有发现 PPA 患者的语言功能临床评分在主动 tDCS 刺激和假刺激之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Multifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy.多部位经颅直流电刺激治疗原发性进行性失语症并不优于言语治疗。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(3):1169-1180. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230069.
2
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症患者语言和交流能力的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
3
Testing the therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in semantic dementia: a double blind, sham controlled, randomized clinical trial.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗语义性痴呆的疗效测试:一项双盲、假刺激对照、随机临床试验。
Trials. 2019 Nov 20;20(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3613-z.
4
The effect of tDCS on functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia.经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症功能连接的影响。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 21;19:703-715. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.023. eCollection 2018.
5
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series.经颅直流电刺激联合动词网络强化治疗改善原发性进行性失语症患者的动词命名:一项病例系列研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jul 12;31(4):1736-1754. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00272. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Specificity in Generalization Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Primary Progressive Aphasia.左侧额下回经颅直流电刺激对原发性进行性失语症泛化效应的特异性。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jun;26(4):850-860. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
Direct current stimulation over the anterior temporal areas boosts semantic processing in primary progressive aphasia.直流电刺激额前颞区可增强原发性进行性失语症的语义处理。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Nov;80(5):693-707. doi: 10.1002/ana.24766. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经颅直流电刺激与假刺激治疗脑卒中后失语症的随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287.
9
Sex differences in effects of tDCS and language treatments on brain functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia.经颅直流电刺激和语言治疗对原发性进行性失语症脑功能连接影响的性别差异。
Neuroimage Clin. 2023;37:103329. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103329. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
10
Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of primary progressive aphasia: An open-label pilot study.经颅直流电刺激治疗原发性进行性失语:一项开放标签的试点研究。
Brain Lang. 2016 Nov;162:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-modal approach for the treatment of non-fluent/agrammatic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia.一种治疗原发性进行性失语非流利型/语法缺失型的多模式方法。
Brain Commun. 2025 Sep 3;7(5):fcaf295. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf295. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Treatment: A Review.经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激在原发性进行性失语症治疗中的疗效:一项综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):839. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080839.
3
An integrated multifocal tDCS-EEG protocol for reducing cognitive and affective symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and early stages of dementia: a crossover double-blind randomized controlled trial.
一种用于减轻轻度认知障碍和痴呆早期认知及情感症状的集成多焦点经颅直流电刺激-脑电图方案:一项交叉双盲随机对照试验。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1605970. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1605970. eCollection 2025.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Different Therapeutic Interventions for Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Systematic Review.原发性进行性失语不同治疗干预措施的安全性与有效性:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 29;14(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093063.
5
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia with and Without Concomitant Speech and Language Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.原发性进行性失语症中无创脑刺激联合与不联合言语语言治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09659-5.