Del Mar C, Badger P
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Queensland Medical School, Herston.
Med J Aust. 1989 Aug 7;151(3):151-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb139600.x.
An audit of routine urine testing by dipsticks at a large private provincial hospital analysed 2294 patient records. No result was recorded in 12% of records. Abnormal but expected results were obtained in 9% of cases. Of the 4% of unexpectedly abnormal results, in only one-third of patients was the attending practitioner aware of these results and, in fewer than one-fifth of the patients, were further diagnostic tests performed. In not one case was treatment altered.
一家大型省级私立医院对试纸法常规尿液检测进行的一项审计分析了2294份患者记录。12%的记录未记录结果。9%的病例获得了异常但预期的结果。在4%的意外异常结果中,只有三分之一的患者的主治医生知晓这些结果,并且在不到五分之一的患者中进行了进一步的诊断测试。没有一例治疗方案被改变。