Johnsen Sönke, Gagnon Yakir L, Marshall N Justin, Cronin Thomas W, Gruev Viktor, Powell Samuel
Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Curr Biol. 2016 Aug 22;26(16):R752-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.030.
Although the function of polarization vision, the ability to discern the polarization characteristics of light, is well established in many terrestrial and benthic species, its purpose in pelagic species (squid and certain fish and crustaceans) is poorly understood [1]. A long-held hypothesis is that polarization vision in open water is used to break the mirror camouflage of silvery fish, as biological mirrors can change the polarization of reflected light [2,3]. Although, the addition of polarization information may increase the conspicuousness of silvery fish at close range, direct evidence that silvery fish - or indeed any pelagic animal - are visible at longer distances using polarization vision rather than using radiance (i.e. brightness) vision is lacking. Here we show, using in situ polarization imagery and a new visual detection model, that polarization vision does not in fact appear to allow viewers to see silvery fish at greater distances.
尽管偏振视觉(即辨别光的偏振特性的能力)在许多陆地和底栖物种中的功能已得到充分证实,但其在远洋物种(鱿鱼、某些鱼类和甲壳类动物)中的作用却鲜为人知[1]。长期以来的一种假设是,开阔水域中的偏振视觉用于识破银色鱼类的镜面伪装,因为生物镜面会改变反射光的偏振[2,3]。然而,尽管添加偏振信息可能会增加银色鱼类在近距离的显眼程度,但缺乏直接证据表明银色鱼类——或者实际上任何远洋动物——利用偏振视觉而非辐射(即亮度)视觉在更远的距离可见。在这里,我们使用现场偏振成像和一种新的视觉检测模型表明,事实上偏振视觉似乎并不能让观察者在更远的距离看到银色鱼类。