Electrophysiology Section, Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;1(8):938-944. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2361.
Significant differences have been described between women and men regarding presentation, mechanism, and treatment outcome of certain arrhythmias. Previous studies of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not included sufficient women for meaningful comparison.
To compare outcomes between women and men with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational study performed between 2002 and 2013, conducted by the International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group, consisting of 12 high-volume ablation centers. Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation were studied. Structural heart disease was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 55%, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or right ventricular cardiomyopathy, with scar confirmed during electroanatomic mapping.
Catheter ablation.
Ventricular tachycardia-free survival and transplant-free survival were compared between women and men. Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed.
Of 2062 patients undergoing ablation, 266 (12.9%) were women. Mean (SD) age was 62.4 (13.3) years and 1095 (53.1%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Compared with men, women were younger, with higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less VT storm. Despite this, women had higher rates of 1-year VT recurrence following ablation (30.5% vs 25.3%; P = .03). This difference was only partially explained by higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy among women and was actually most pronounced among those with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
In 12 high-volume ablation centers, women with structural heart disease have worse VT-free survival following ablation than men. Whether this is owing to differences in referral pattern, arrhythmia substrate, or undertreatment requires further study.
在某些心律失常的表现、机制和治疗结果方面,男女之间存在显著差异。以前关于室性心动过速 (VT) 消融的研究没有纳入足够多的女性进行有意义的比较。
比较结构性心脏病患者行 VT 消融治疗的女性和男性患者的结局。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由国际 VT 消融中心协作组开展的、于 2002 年至 2013 年进行的、多中心、观察性研究。该协作组由 12 个大容量消融中心组成。研究对象为接受 VT 消融治疗的结构性心脏病连续患者。结构性心脏病定义为左心室射血分数小于 55%、肥厚型心肌病或右心室心肌病,在电解剖标测期间确认有瘢痕。
导管消融。
比较女性和男性患者的 VT 无复发生存率和移植无复发生存率。采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行分析。
在 2062 例行消融术的患者中,有 266 例(12.9%)为女性。平均(SD)年龄为 62.4(13.3)岁,1095 例(53.1%)患有缺血性心肌病。与男性相比,女性更年轻,左心室射血分数更高,VT 风暴更少。尽管如此,女性在消融术后 1 年 VT 复发的比例更高(30.5%比 25.3%;P = .03)。这种差异部分是由女性中非缺血性心肌病的患病率较高导致的,在缺血性心肌病患者中最为明显。
在 12 个大容量消融中心中,结构性心脏病女性患者在接受消融治疗后的 VT 无复发生存率比男性差。这种差异是由于转诊模式、心律失常基质或治疗不足的差异造成的,还是其他原因造成的,需要进一步研究。