• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对支持基于优势的医疗保健方法的技术设计的见解。

Patient Insights Into the Design of Technology to Support a Strengths-Based Approach to Health Care.

作者信息

Mirkovic Jelena, Kristjansdottir Olöf Birna, Stenberg Una, Krogseth Tonje, Stange Kurt C, Ruland Cornelia M

机构信息

Centre for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 24;5(3):e175. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5906.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.5906
PMID:27558951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5014985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of research studies in the psychological and biobehavioral sciences support incorporating patients' personal strengths into illness management as a way to empower and activate the patients, thus improving their health and well-being. However, lack of attention to patients' personal strengths is still reported in patient-provider communication. Information technology (IT) has great potential to support strengths-based patient-provider communication and collaboration, but knowledge about the users' requirements and preferences is inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the aspirations and requirements of patients with chronic conditions concerning IT tools that could help increase their awareness of their own personal strengths and resources, and support discussion of these assets in consultations with health care providers.

METHODS

We included patients with different chronic conditions (chronic pain, morbid obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and used various participatory research methods to gain insight into the participants' needs, values, and opinions, and the contexts in which they felt strengths-based IT tools could be used.

RESULTS

Participants were positive toward using technology to support them in identifying and discussing their personal strengths in clinical consultation, but also underlined the importance of fitting it to their specific requirements and the right contexts of use. Participants recommended that technology be designed for use in preconsultation settings (eg, at home) and felt that it should support them in both identifying strengths and in finding out new ways how strengths can be used to attain personal health-related goals. Participants advocated use of technology to support advance preparation for consultations and empower them to take a more active role. IT tools were suggested to be potentially useful in specific contexts, including individual or group consultations with health care providers (physician, nurse, specialist, care team) in clinical consultations but also outside health care settings (eg, as a part of a self-management program). Participants' requirements for functionality and design include, among others: providing examples of strengths reported by other patients with chronic conditions, along with an option to extend the list with personal examples; giving an option to briefly summarize health-related history; using intuitive, easy-to-use but also engaging user interface design. Additionally, the findings are exemplified with a description of a low-fidelity paper prototype of a strengths-based tool, developed with participants in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Users requirements for IT support of a strengths-based approach to health care appear feasible. The presented findings reflect patients' values and lists potential contexts where they feel that technology could facilitate meaningful patient-provider communication that focuses not just on symptoms and problems, but also takes into account patients' strengths and resources. The findings can be used to inform further development of IT tools for use in clinical consultations.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/3fcea16f3e19/resprot_v5i3e175_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/f251ca881c13/resprot_v5i3e175_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/e11ab262bc6a/resprot_v5i3e175_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/6a7e5614e3ba/resprot_v5i3e175_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/84eee974d24d/resprot_v5i3e175_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/45bc5db7dac3/resprot_v5i3e175_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/3fcea16f3e19/resprot_v5i3e175_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/f251ca881c13/resprot_v5i3e175_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/e11ab262bc6a/resprot_v5i3e175_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/6a7e5614e3ba/resprot_v5i3e175_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/84eee974d24d/resprot_v5i3e175_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/45bc5db7dac3/resprot_v5i3e175_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6c/5014985/3fcea16f3e19/resprot_v5i3e175_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

心理和生物行为科学领域越来越多的研究支持将患者的个人优势纳入疾病管理,以此增强患者的能力并激发其积极性,从而改善他们的健康状况和幸福感。然而,患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通中仍存在对患者个人优势关注不足的情况。信息技术(IT)在支持基于优势的患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通与协作方面具有巨大潜力,但对用户需求和偏好的了解却不够充分。

目的

本研究探讨了慢性病患者对IT工具的期望和需求,这些工具可帮助他们提高对自身个人优势和资源的认识,并在与医疗保健提供者的会诊中支持对这些资产的讨论。

方法

我们纳入了患有不同慢性病(慢性疼痛、病态肥胖和慢性阻塞性肺疾病)的患者,并使用了各种参与式研究方法,以深入了解参与者的需求、价值观和意见,以及他们认为可以使用基于优势的IT工具的情境。

结果

参与者对使用技术来支持他们在临床会诊中识别和讨论个人优势持积极态度,但也强调了使其符合他们的特定要求和正确使用情境的重要性。参与者建议技术应设计用于会诊前的环境(如在家中),并认为它应在识别优势以及找出如何利用优势实现个人健康相关目标的新方法方面为他们提供支持。参与者主张使用技术来支持会诊的前期准备,并使他们能够发挥更积极的作用。IT工具被认为在特定情境中可能有用,包括在临床会诊中与医疗保健提供者(医生、护士、专科医生、护理团队)进行的个人或小组会诊,以及在医疗保健环境之外(如作为自我管理计划的一部分)。参与者对功能和设计的要求包括:提供其他慢性病患者报告的优势示例,并提供用个人示例扩展列表的选项;提供简要总结健康相关病史的选项;使用直观、易于使用且引人入胜的用户界面设计。此外,通过描述与本研究参与者共同开发的基于优势的工具的低保真纸质原型对研究结果进行了举例说明。

结论

用户对基于优势的医疗保健IT支持的要求似乎是可行的。所呈现的研究结果反映了患者的价值观,并列出了他们认为技术可以促进有意义的患者与医疗服务提供者沟通的潜在情境,这种沟通不仅关注症状和问题,还考虑到患者的优势和资源。这些研究结果可用于为临床会诊中使用的IT工具的进一步开发提供参考。

相似文献

1
Patient Insights Into the Design of Technology to Support a Strengths-Based Approach to Health Care.患者对支持基于优势的医疗保健方法的技术设计的见解。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 24;5(3):e175. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5906.
2
Developing Technology to Mobilize Personal Strengths in People with Chronic Illness: Positive Codesign Approach.开发技术以调动慢性病患者的个人优势:积极协同设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Jun 5;2(1):e10774. doi: 10.2196/10774.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Mobile App to Help People With Chronic Illness Reflect on Their Strengths: Formative Evaluation and Usability Testing.帮助慢性病患者反思自身优势的移动应用程序:形成性评估与可用性测试
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Mar 4;4(3):e16831. doi: 10.2196/16831.
5
Creating Gameful Design in mHealth: A Participatory Co-Design Approach.在移动健康领域创建游戏化设计:一种参与式协同设计方法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):e11579. doi: 10.2196/11579.
6
Patient empowerment through a user-centered design of an electronic personal health record: a qualitative study of user requirements in chronic kidney disease.通过以用户为中心的电子个人健康记录设计实现患者赋权:慢性肾脏病患者需求的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01689-2.
7
8
MyStrengths, a Strengths-Focused Mobile Health Tool: Participatory Design and Development.MyStrengths,一款以优势为导向的移动健康工具:参与式设计与开发。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jul 24;4(7):e18049. doi: 10.2196/18049.
9
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengths-based interventions for patients with chronic diseases and/or caregivers: a systematic review protocol.针对慢性病患者和/或护理人员的基于优势的干预措施:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 15;15(5):e093401. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093401.
2
Drivers and barriers to promoting self-care in individuals living with multiple long-term health conditions: a cross-sectional online survey of health and care professionals.促进患有多种长期健康状况的个体进行自我护理的驱动因素和障碍:对健康与护理专业人员的横断面在线调查
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21737-0.
3
Exploring lack of trust and its impact on access and utilization of primary healthcare services among African immigrant women in the United States: a qualitative study of Ethiopian immigrant women.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Virtues and Character Traits of Rehabilitation Clients: The Adapted Inventory of Virtues and Strengths.测量康复客户的美德和性格特质:修订版美德与优势量表
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Mar;26(1):32-44. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9619-9.
2
An Online Tailored Self-Management Program for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Developmental Study.一项针对类风湿关节炎患者的在线定制自我管理计划:一项发展性研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 25;4(4):e140. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4571.
3
How to Increase Reach and Adherence of Web-Based Interventions: A Design Research Viewpoint.
探索美国非洲移民女性中缺乏信任及其对初级医疗保健服务获取和利用的影响:一项针对埃塞俄比亚移民女性的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11798-z.
4
A culturally informed model to enhance breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: perspectives of American Indian adults and healthcare providers in rural New Mexico.一种增强乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的文化感知模型:新墨西哥州农村地区美国印第安成年人和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Oct;34(10):855-871. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01721-y. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Evaluating a Strengths-Based mHealth Tool (MyStrengths): Explorative Feasibility Trial.评估基于优势的移动健康工具(MyStrengths):探索性可行性试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 17;5(11):e30572. doi: 10.2196/30572.
6
Process research: compare and contrast the recovery-orientated strengths model of case management and usual community mental health care.过程研究:比较和对比以康复为导向的个案管理优势模型和常规社区精神卫生保健。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 28;21(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03523-5.
7
Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long-term condition: a mixed methods review.针对患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病和至少一种其他长期疾病的成年人的定制或改编干预措施:一项混合方法综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 26;7(7):CD013384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013384.pub2.
8
Designing the Optimal Digital Health Intervention for Patients' Use Before and After Elective Orthopedic Surgery: Qualitative Study.设计优化的数字健康干预措施,以满足择期骨科手术前后患者的使用需求:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e25885. doi: 10.2196/25885.
9
Evaluation of More Stamina, a Mobile App for Fatigue Management in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study.评估“更有耐力”,一款用于多发性硬化症患者疲劳管理的移动应用程序:一项可行性、可接受性和可用性研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(8):e18196. doi: 10.2196/18196.
10
MyStrengths, a Strengths-Focused Mobile Health Tool: Participatory Design and Development.MyStrengths,一款以优势为导向的移动健康工具:参与式设计与开发。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jul 24;4(7):e18049. doi: 10.2196/18049.
如何提高基于网络干预措施的覆盖面和依从性:设计研究视角
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 10;17(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4201.
4
Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: systematic review of the qualitative literature.患有多种慢性病时自我管理的挑战:定性文献的系统综述
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Dec;60(12):1123-33.
5
Seeing the whole person: feasibility of using the Omaha System to describe strengths of older adults with chronic illness.审视完整的个体:运用奥马哈系统描述慢性病老年人优势的可行性
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2014;28(4):299-315. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.28.4.299.
6
Communication during patient-provider encounters regarding diabetes self-management.患者与医护人员交流过程中关于糖尿病自我管理的内容。
Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(7):475-83.
7
Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room.通过在检查室使用电子健康记录来加强以患者为中心的沟通与协作。
JAMA. 2013 Jun 12;309(22):2327-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6030.
8
Processes of self-management in chronic illness.慢性病的自我管理过程。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Jun;44(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
Systems of care as asset-building communities: implementing strengths-based planning and positive youth development.照护系统作为资产建设社区:实施基于优势的规划和正向青少年发展。
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Jun;49(3-4):556-65. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9514-x.
10
Effects of an interactive tailored patient assessment tool on eliciting and responding to cancer patients' cues and concerns in clinical consultations with physicians and nurses.交互式定制化患者评估工具对医生和护士临床咨询中引出和回应癌症患者线索和关注点的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.024. Epub 2011 May 17.