Suppr超能文献

吡格列酮作为过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ激动剂治疗轻度哮喘的双盲随机对照试验

Evaluation of the PPAR-γ Agonist Pioglitazone in Mild Asthma: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Anderson J R, Mortimer K, Pang L, Smith K M, Bailey H, Hodgson D B, Shaw D E, Knox A J, Harrison T W

机构信息

Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK and Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Fazakerley, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0160257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160257. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a nuclear receptor that modulates inflammation in models of asthma. To determine whether pioglitazone improves measures of asthma control and airway inflammation, we performed a single-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

METHODS

Sixty-eight participants with mild asthma were randomized to 12 weeks pioglitazone (30 mg for 4 weeks, then 45 mg for 8 weeks) or placebo. The primary outcome was the adjusted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were mean peak expiratory flow (PEF), scores on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PD20), induced sputum counts, and sputum supernatant interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels. Study recruitment was closed early after considering the European Medicines Agency's reports of a potential increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone treatment. Fifty-five cases were included in the full analysis (FA) and 52 in the per-protocol (PP) analysis.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the adjusted FEV1 at 12 weeks (-0.014 L, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.15 to 0.12, p = 0.84) or in any of the secondary outcomes in the FA. The PP analysis replicated the FA, with the exception of a lower evening PEF in the pioglitazone group (-21 L/min, 95% CI -39 to -4, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that treatment with 12 weeks of pioglitazone improved asthma control or airway inflammation in mild asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01134835.

摘要

背景

过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPAR-γ)是一种核受体,可调节哮喘模型中的炎症反应。为了确定吡格列酮是否能改善哮喘控制和气道炎症指标,我们进行了一项单中心随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。

方法

68例轻度哮喘患者被随机分为两组,分别接受12周的吡格列酮治疗(4周30mg,然后8周45mg)或安慰剂治疗。主要结局指标是12周时调整后的一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)。次要结局指标包括平均呼气峰值流速(PEF)、朱尼珀哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)和哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)得分、呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)、支气管高反应性(PD20)、诱导痰细胞计数以及痰上清液中γ干扰素诱导蛋白10(IP-10)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、单核细胞趋化蛋白1(MCP-1)和嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)水平。在考虑欧洲药品管理局关于吡格列酮治疗可能增加膀胱癌风险的报告后,研究招募提前结束。55例纳入全分析(FA),52例纳入符合方案分析(PP)。

结果

12周时调整后的FEV1无差异(-0.014L,95%置信区间[CI]-0.15至0.12,p = 0.84),FA中的任何次要结局指标也无差异。PP分析重复了FA的结果,但吡格列酮组夜间PEF较低(-21L/min,95%CI -39至-4,p = 0.02)除外。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明12周的吡格列酮治疗能改善轻度哮喘的哮喘控制或气道炎症。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01134835。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8622/4999189/9cd364605019/pone.0160257.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验