• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用iPad进行对比度敏感度测量的显示器间再现性

Inter-Display Reproducibility of Contrast Sensitivity Measurement with iPad.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Vallejo Manuel, Monsoriu Juan A, Furlan Walter D

机构信息

*MS †PhD Qvision, Unidad de Oftalmología, Vithas Hospital Virgen del Mar, Almería, Spain (MR-V); Centro de Tecnologías Físicas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain (JAM); and Departamento de Óptica, Universitat de València, Burjassot, Spain (WDF).

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Dec;93(12):1532-1536. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000972.

DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000972
PMID:27560848
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of measuring CS with uncalibrated iPads.

METHODS

Six random iPads with retina display were calibrated with a colorimeter and the correlation between Luminance (L) and pixel level (y) was computed according to an exponential function. The mean and confidence interval (±2SD) obtained from the six iPads were calculated and the bit-stealing technique was applied for expanding y from 256 to 2540 possible values. The L of the optotype was computed for the selected contrast values (logC) represented in log units, using 0.1 log and 0.05 log steps. At each particular y, the contrast was considered reliable when the mean L plus 2SD was less than half the difference of luminance between two consecutive levels of contrast. Differences between the iPads for the Experimental logC were evaluated with the Friedman test.

RESULTS

Luminance properties vary between devices, which were reflected in the computed Experimental logC (p < 0.0005). The contrast was found to be reliable for 0.1 log steps in the range from 0 to -2.2 log. On the other hand, for steps of 0.05 log, the contrast was only reliable for values ranging from 0 to -1.7 log.

DISCUSSION

Both luminance and contrast steps differed between iPads with the same retina display, making it necessary to calibrate each display to achieve accurate luminance and contrast steps of 0.05 log units or less. However, for screening purposes utilizing contrast steps of 0.1 log unit or greater for a validated psychophysical test, calibration is not required to achieve accurate results across the displays described herein.

摘要

目的

评估使用未经校准的iPad测量对比度敏感度(CS)的可靠性。

方法

用色度计对六台随机选取的配备视网膜显示屏的iPad进行校准,并根据指数函数计算亮度(L)与像素水平(y)之间的相关性。计算从这六台iPad获得的平均值和置信区间(±2SD),并应用位窃取技术将y从256扩展到2540个可能值。对于以对数单位表示的选定对比度值(logC),使用0.1 log和0.05 log步长计算视标(optotype)的L。在每个特定的y值处,当平均L加上2SD小于两个连续对比度水平之间亮度差异的一半时,对比度被认为是可靠的。使用Friedman检验评估实验logC在各iPad之间的差异。

结果

不同设备之间的亮度特性有所不同,这在计算出的实验logC中得到了体现(p < 0.0005)。发现在0至 -2.2 log范围内,0.1 log步长的对比度是可靠的。另一方面,对于0.05 log步长,对比度仅在0至 -1.7 log范围内是可靠的。

讨论

具有相同视网膜显示屏的iPad之间,亮度和对比度步长均存在差异,因此有必要对每个显示屏进行校准,以实现0.05 log单位或更小的准确亮度和对比度步长。然而,对于使用0.1 log单位或更大对比度步长进行经过验证的心理物理学测试的筛查目的,无需校准即可在此处所述的各显示屏上获得准确结果。

相似文献

1
Inter-Display Reproducibility of Contrast Sensitivity Measurement with iPad.使用iPad进行对比度敏感度测量的显示器间再现性
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Dec;93(12):1532-1536. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000972.
2
Display Characterization for Contrast Sensitivity Testing.对比敏感度测试的显示特性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Apr 1;100(4):271-275. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002009. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Psychophysical contrast calibration.心理物理学对比度校准。
Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
4
Natural display mode for digital DICOM-conformant diagnostic imaging.用于符合数字DICOM标准的诊断成像的自然显示模式。
Acad Radiol. 2002 Sep;9(9):1025-35. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80478-6.
5
The effect of time in use on the display performance of the iPad.使用时间对iPad显示性能的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jul;89(1063):20150657. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150657. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Evaluation of grey-scale standard display function as a calibration tool for diagnostic liquid crystal display monitors using psychophysical analysis.使用心理物理学分析评估灰度标准显示功能作为诊断液晶显示器校准工具的效果。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 May;43(3):319-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02345807.
7
Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.用于显示计算机X线摄影图像的阴极射线管与胶片的比较。
Med Phys. 1998 Jul;25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. doi: 10.1118/1.598304.
8
Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.在 iPad 上快速可靠地评估对比敏感度功能。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 5;54(12):7266-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11743.
9
Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.iPad字母对比度敏感度测试的验证
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar;91(3):291-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000158.
10
Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis.基于单个像素进行颜色位窃取以提高数字显示器的亮度分辨率。
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):369-77. doi: 10.1163/156856897x00294.

引用本文的文献

1
Age norms for grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in children using eye tracking technology.使用眼动追踪技术的儿童光栅视力和对比敏感度的年龄规范。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;42(3):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02040-4. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
Portable rotating grating stimulation for anisometropic amblyopia with 6 months training.携带式旋转光栅刺激治疗 6 个月对斜视性弱视的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):11430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90936-7.
3
Characterization of optical performance with defocusing curve: Analysis of two refractive intraocular lens models with high and medium addition.
基于散焦曲线的光学性能表征:两种高低附加度数的折射型人工晶状体模型分析
J Optom. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Above-average defocus curves in photopic and mesopic vision with multifocal intraocular lenses after laser assisted keratomileusis.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后使用多焦点人工晶状体的明视觉和中间视觉中高于平均水平的离焦曲线
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1620-1623. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.23. eCollection 2017.